Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 20/02/2023 09:24

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

1 réponse intégrée de Michelle Dawson

20/02/2023 09:44

Note: "key areas of missing research were highlighted by participants, including research focused on the strengths of autistic people..."?--that research would be in the denounced "biological" category

Voir la réponse sur Twitter/X

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Lisa Marie Emerson, Elizabeth Pellicano, Ruth Monk, Melissa Lim, Jessica Heaton, Laurie McLay (2023). A portfolio analysis of autism research funding in Aotearoa New Zealand 2007–2021. Autism, 136236132311559. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
19/02/2023
Identifiant
10.1177/13623613231155954
Auteurs
Lisa Marie Emerson, Elizabeth Pellicano, Ruth Monk, Melissa Lim, Jessica Heaton, Laurie McLay
Source
Autism
Détails
136236132311559
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Previously documented global trends in autism research funding have been skewed towards biology research, which is at odds with the priorities expressed by autistic and autism community members. We aimed to document the areas of autism research that have previously been funded in Aotearoa New Zealand, and to explore the views of the autistic and autism communities on this funding distribution. We searched for research grants awarded to autism research in Aotearoa New Zealand between 2007 and 2021. We categorised the funding for autism research to enable comparison to that previously documented in other countries. We elicited the views of the autistic and autism communities in relation to the funded autism research, through an online survey and a series of focus groups. The largest proportion of money and number of grants was awarded to biological research. Community members expressed dissatisfaction with this pattern of funding, and noted that it does not address the needs and priorities of the autistic community. Community members suggested that the funding pattern indicated a lack of autistic consultation and engagement in research design and funding allocation. The priorities of the autistic and autism communities need to be considered by researchers and funders alike. We discuss how autistic inclusion in research can be supported through decision-making regarding funding and ethics relating to autism research. Lay Abstract We aimed to document the areas of autism research that have previously been funded in Aotearoa New Zealand. We searched for research grants awarded to autism research in Aotearoa New Zealand between 2007 and 2021. We compared the funding distribution in Aotearoa New Zealand to other countries. We asked people from the autistic community and broader autism community whether they were satisfied with this funding pattern, and whether it aligned with what is important to them and to autistic people. We found that the majority of funding for autism research was awarded to biology research (67%). Members of the autistic and autism communities were dissatisfied with the funding distribution, and expressed a lack of alignment with what is important to them. People from the community indicated that the funding distribution did not address the priorities of autistic people, and that it indicated a lack of engagement with autistic people. Autism research funding needs to reflect the priorities of the autistic and autism communities. Autistic people need to be included in autism research and related funding decisions.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée