Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 26/11/2022 08:23

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Rachel K. Schuck, Patrick Dwyer, Kaitlynn M. P. Baiden, Zachary J. Williams, Mian Wang (2024). Social Validity of Pivotal Response Treatment for Young Autistic Children: Perspectives of Autistic Adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54(2), 423-441. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
24/11/2022
Identifiant
10.1007/s10803-022-05808-4
Auteurs
Rachel K. Schuck, Patrick Dwyer, Kaitlynn M. P. Baiden, Zachary J. Williams, Mian Wang
Source
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Détails
54(2), 423-441
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract The social validity of autism behavioral intervention has been questioned. Naturalistic Developmental Behavioral Interventions (NDBIs) attempt to address some concerns, but it is unclear whether autistic people consider NDBIs socially valid. Social validity of an NDBI, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT), was investigated through autistic adults commenting on videos of autistic children receiving PRT. Qualitative coding of responses generated three themes: respect for individuals; assessment of intervention implementation; and socioemotional considerations. Although video brevity limits the scope of the present study’s conclusions, participants highlighted PRT components that appeared socially valid (e.g., reinforcing attempts, following the child’s lead) and aspects appearing invalid (e.g., overemphasis on spoken language). Therefore, adjustments appear necessary for PRT to be fully acceptable to the autistic community.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée