Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 22/09/2022 07:32

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Matthew P. Normand, Hailey E. Donohue (2022). Behavior analytic jargon does not seem to influence treatment acceptability ratings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 55(4), 1294-1305. Wiley.

Date de publication
21/09/2022
Identifiant
10.1002/jaba.953
Auteurs
Matthew P. Normand, Hailey E. Donohue
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Détails
55(4), 1294-1305
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Some have argued that behavior analysts have insulated themselves by eschewing the vernacular and adopting idiosyncratic and sometimes counterintuitive technical terms to describe their science and practice. Because of this, behavior analysis plays a minor role in psychology and related fields and effective behavior‐change interventions go unused. All told, findings about the effects of behavior‐analytic jargon are mixed. Studies that provided technical terms independent of context have produced unfavorable results, whereas studies that have provided context have produced positive or neutral results, overall. This study evaluated the effects of behavioral jargon on the acceptability ratings of several applied behavior analysis interventions described in terms of varying target behaviors, populations, and settings. We presented brief vignettes adapted from published research articles that were described in either jargon or nonjargon versions. There were no appreciable differences in the rated acceptability of interventions described with or without jargon.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée