Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 22/08/2022 14:29

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Anila M. D'Mello, Isabelle R. Frosch, Cindy E. Li, Annie L. Cardinaux, John D.E. Gabrieli (2022). Exclusion of females in autism research: Empirical evidence for a “leaky” recruitment‐to‐research pipeline. Autism Research, 15(10), 1929-1940. Wiley.

Date de publication
22/08/2022
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.2795
Auteurs
Anila M. D'Mello, Isabelle R. Frosch, Cindy E. Li, Annie L. Cardinaux, John D.E. Gabrieli
Source
Autism Research
Détails
15(10), 1929-1940
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is characterized by challenges in social communication and the presence of repetitive behaviors or restricted interests. Notably, males are four times as likely as females to be diagnosed with autism. Despite efforts to increase representation and characterization of autistic females, research studies consistently enroll small samples of females, or exclude females altogether. Importantly, researchers often rely on standardized measures to confirm diagnosis prior to enrollment in research studies. We retrospectively analyzed the effects of one such measure (Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule, ADOS) on research inclusion/exclusion rates by sex in autistic adults, all of whom had a preexisting community diagnosis of autism (n = 145, 95 male, 50 female). Using the ADOS as a confirmatory diagnostic measure resulted in the exclusion of autistic females at a rate over 2.5 times higher than that of autistic males. We compared sex ratios in our sample to those in other large, publically available datasets that rely either on community diagnosis (6 datasets, total n = 42,209) or standardized assessments (2 datasets, total n = 214) to determine eligibility of participants for research. Reliance on community diagnosis rather than confirmatory diagnostic assessments resulted in significantly more equal sex ratios. These results provide evidence for a “leaky” recruitment‐to‐research pipeline for females in autism research. Lay Summary Despite efforts to increase the representation of autistic females in research, studies consistently enroll small samples of females or exclude females altogether. We find that despite making up almost 50% of the initially recruited sample based upon self‐report of community diagnosis, autistic females are disproportonately excluded from research participation as a result of commonly used autism diagnostic measures. In our sample, and several other publically available datasets, reliance on community diagnosis resulted in significantly more equal sex ratios.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée