Publication avec DOI
Récupéré
Réponse intégrée
crossref
Michelle Dawson, Sue Fletcher‐Watson
(2021).
Commentary: What conflicts of interest tell us about autism intervention research—a commentary on Bottema‐Beutel et al. (2020).
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 62(1), 16-18.
Wiley.
- Date de publication
-
26/08/2020
- Identifiant
-
10.1111/jcpp.13315
- Auteurs
-
Michelle Dawson,
Sue Fletcher‐Watson
- Source
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Détails
- 62(1), 16-18
- Type de référence
- article
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Source de métadonnées
- crossref
Résumé
Abstract Bottema‐Beutel, Crowley, Sandbank, and Woynaroski (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2020) have performed a Herculean and invaluable task in their investigation of conflicts of interest (COIs) in nonpharmacological early autism intervention research. Drawing on a meta‐analysis of 150 articles reporting group designs, they found COIs in 105 (70%), only 6 (5.7%) of which had fully accurate COI statements. Most reports had no COI statements, but among the 48 (32%) which did, the majority of those declaring no COIs had detectable COIs (23 of 30; 77%). Thus, COI reporting in the literature examined is routinely missing, misleading, and/or incomplete; accurate reporting is the exception rather than the rule. That 120 of the 150 reports were published in 2010 or later, compared to 6 pre‐2000, tells us this is not about practices confined to decades past. Instead, it reflects and is a telling indictment of established standards in autism intervention research.
Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée