Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 09/07/2022 16:00

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Eya‐Mist Rødgaard, Kristian Jensen, Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak, Laurent Mottron (2022). Representativeness of autistic samples in studies recruiting through social media. Autism Research, 15(8), 1447-1456. Wiley.

Date de publication
09/07/2022
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.2777
Auteurs
Eya‐Mist Rødgaard, Kristian Jensen, Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak, Laurent Mottron
Source
Autism Research
Détails
15(8), 1447-1456
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Survey‐based research with recruitment through online channels is a convenient way to obtain large samples and has recently been increasingly used in autism research. However, sampling from online channels may be associated with a high risk of sampling bias causing findings not to be generalizable to the autism population. Here we examined autism studies that have sampled on social media for markers of sampling bias. Most samples showed one or more indicators of sampling bias, in the form of reversed sex ratio, higher employment rates, higher education level, lower fraction of individuals with intellectual disability, and later age of diagnosis than would be expected when comparing with for example population study results from published research. Findings from many of the included studies are therefore difficult to generalize to the broader autism population. Suggestions for how research strategies may be adapted to address some of the problems are discussed. Lay Summary Online surveys offer a convenient way to recruit large numbers of participants for autism research. However, the resulting samples may not fully reflect the autism population. Here we investigated the samples of 36 autism studies that recruited participants online and found that the demographic composition tended to deviate from what has been reported about the autism population in previous research. The results may thus not be generalizable to autism in general.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée