Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 22/02/2022 15:52

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Sander Werkhoven, Joel H. Anderson, Ingrid A. M. Robeyns (2022). Who benefits from diagnostic labels for developmental disorders?. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 64(8), 944-949. Wiley.

Date de publication
21/02/2022
Identifiant
10.1111/dmcn.15177
Auteurs
Sander Werkhoven, Joel H. Anderson, Ingrid A. M. Robeyns
Source
Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology
Détails
64(8), 944-949
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

The number of diagnoses of developmental disorders is on the rise and the use of labels for developmental disorders, such as attention‐deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder, is widening. Diagnostic labels can play an important role in helping those who display atypical behaviour and their caregivers to cope with associated challenges and, possibly, to get treatment. But these labels are increasingly contested and associated with a variety of harmful effects. In this paper, we analyze the role diagnostic labels can play in four different contexts (scientific, therapeutic, social, and administrative) and identify what various stakeholders stand to gain or lose with continued, expanded, or abolished use of those labels. Our analysis reveals labels serve different purposes in each of these contexts, benefitting different stakeholders. Any overall evaluation, critique, or defence of labels needs to consider the interests of all stakeholders in these contexts.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée