Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 06/02/2022 06:21

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris (2024). Passionate about languages, but listening and speaking – ¡Ay, Caramba! Autistic adults discuss foreign language learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(6), 1888-1903. Informa UK Limited.

Date de publication
février 2022
Identifiant
10.1080/01434632.2022.2029869
Auteurs
Catherine L. Caldwell-Harris
Source
Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development
Détails
45(6), 1888-1903
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Informa UK Limited
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Little is known about how persons with autism spectrum conditions experience the process of learning foreign languages. To augment the research literature (reviewed here) with the experiences of autistic persons, online autism forums were scrutinised. Discussions pertinent to language learning were identified in English, Spanish, French and German, with 169 posts analysed. Thematic analysis revealed 8 themes. Three themes concerned ease and difficulty of learning. Reading and writing were strengths, due to their offline nature. Listening comprehension was difficult, especially with background noise. Speaking was difficult, due to demands of immediacy. Four inter-related themes could be understood as positive outcomes of autistic traits. Languages were a special interest, and many posters reported being self-taught. Posters often listed many languages but acknowledged that learning their full list was impractical. Posters reported being interested in diverse aspects of language structure, suggesting that languages were compelling because they provided an opportunity for systemising. Finally, posters discussed how autism conferred both advantages and disadvantages for language learning. Some posters discussed their engagement in terms reminiscent of polyglots and mild forms of linguistic savantism. This analysis revealed a group of curious learners whose abilities and strengths are mostly unknown to applied linguists.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée