Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 29/10/2021 16:53

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Anastasia Shuster, Lilah Inzelberg, Ori Ossmy, Liz Izakson, Yael Hanein, Dino J. Levy (2021). Lie to my face: An electromyography approach to the study of deceptive behavior. Brain and Behavior, 11(12), e2386. Wiley.

Date de publication
22/10/2021
Identifiant
10.1002/brb3.2386
Auteurs
Anastasia Shuster, Lilah Inzelberg, Ori Ossmy, Liz Izakson, Yael Hanein, Dino J. Levy
Source
Brain and Behavior
Détails
11(12), e2386
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Background Deception is present in all walks of life, from social interactions to matters of homeland security. Nevertheless, reliable indicators of deceptive behavior in real‐life scenarios remain elusive. Methods By integrating electrophysiological and communicative approaches, we demonstrate a new and objective detection approach to identify participant‐specific indicators of deceptive behavior in an interactive scenario of a two‐person deception task. We recorded participants' facial muscle activity using novel dry screen‐printed electrode arrays and applied machine‐learning algorithms to identify lies based on brief facial responses. Results With an average accuracy of 73%, we identified two groups of participants: Those who revealed their lies by activating their cheek muscles and those who activated their eyebrows. We found that the participants lied more often with time, with some switching their telltale muscle groups. Moreover, while the automated classifier, reported here, outperformed untrained human detectors, their performance was correlated, suggesting reliance on shared features. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of using wearable electrode arrays in detecting human lies in a social setting and set the stage for future research on individual differences in deception expression.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée