Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 25/10/2021 02:26

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

R. Randeniya, I. Vilares, J. B. Mattingley, M. I. Garrido (2021). Reduced context updating but intact visual priors in autism. openRxiv.

Date de publication
23/10/2021
Identifiant
10.1101/2021.10.21.464885
Auteurs
R. Randeniya, I. Vilares, J. B. Mattingley, M. I. Garrido
Type de référence
preprint
Éditeur
openRxiv
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract A general consensus persists that sensory-perceptual differences in autism, such as hypersensitivities to light or sound, result from an overreliance on new (rather than prior) sensory observations. However, conflicting Bayesian accounts of autism remain unresolved as to whether such alterations are caused by more precise sensory observations (precise likelihood model) or by forming a less precise model of the sensory context (hypo-priors model). We used a decision-under-uncertainty paradigm that manipulated uncertainty in both likelihoods and priors. Contrary to model predictions we found no differences in reliance on likelihood in autistic group (AS) compared to neurotypicals (NT) and found no differences in subjective prior variance between groups. However, we found reduced context adjustment in the AS group compared to NT. Further, the AS group showed heightened variability in their relative weighting of sensory information (vs. prior) on a trial-by-trial basis. When participants were aligned on a continuum of autistic traits, we found no associations with likelihood reliance or prior variance but found an increased likelihood precision with autistic traits. These findings together provide empirical evidence for intact priors, precise likelihood, reduced context updating and heightened variability during sensory learning in autism.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée