Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 23/10/2021 14:24

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Jelle Bruineberg, Krzysztof Dołęga, Joe Dewhurst, Manuel Baltieri (2022). The Emperor's New Markov Blankets. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 45, e183. Cambridge University Press (CUP).

Date de publication
22/10/2021
Identifiant
10.1017/s0140525x21002351
Auteurs
Jelle Bruineberg, Krzysztof Dołęga, Joe Dewhurst, Manuel Baltieri
Source
Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Détails
45, e183
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract The free energy principle, an influential framework in computational neuroscience and theoretical neurobiology, starts from the assumption that living systems ensure adaptive exchanges with their environment by minimizing the objective function of variational free energy. Following this premise, it claims to deliver a promising integration of the life sciences. In recent work, Markov blankets, one of the central constructs of the free energy principle, have been applied to resolve debates central to philosophy (such as demarcating the boundaries of the mind). The aim of this paper is twofold. First, we trace the development of Markov blankets starting from their standard application in Bayesian networks, via variational inference, to their use in the literature on active inference. We then identify a persistent confusion in the literature between the formal use of Markov blankets as an epistemic tool for Bayesian inference, and their novel metaphysical use in the free energy framework to demarcate the physical boundary between an agent and its environment. Consequently, we propose to distinguish between “Pearl blankets” to refer to the original epistemic use of Markov blankets and “Friston blankets” to refer to the new metaphysical construct. Second, we use this distinction to critically assess claims resting on the application of Markov blankets to philosophical problems. We suggest that this literature would do well in differentiating between two different research programmes: “inference with a model” and “inference within a model.” Only the latter is capable of doing metaphysical work with Markov blankets, but requires additional philosophical premises and cannot be justified by an appeal to the success of the mathematical framework alone.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée