Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 07/09/2021 03:05

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Pierre Defresne, Laurent Mottron (2022). Clinical Situations in Which the Diagnosis of Autism is Debatable: An Analysis and Recommendations. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 67(5), 331-335. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
06/09/2021
Identifiant
10.1177/07067437211041469
Auteurs
Pierre Defresne, Laurent Mottron
Source
The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
Détails
67(5), 331-335
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

The “autism spectrum disorder” (ASD) construct and its current diagnostic criteria have led to the inclusion of increasingly heterogeneous and decreasingly atypical individuals under its definition. This broad category, based on the polymorphic clinical expression of common genetic variants underpinning the risk of autism, is likely beneficial for certain individuals. However, determining the boundaries between ASD and typical individuals, as well as those with other neurodevelopmental conditions, remains an issue of which the importance is growing with the increase in ASD prevalence. We identified four clinical contexts associated with a questionable, poorly justified, or unhelpful ASD diagnosis: (1) those in which diagnostic instruments raise uncertainties, (2) in the context of a subclinical presentation, (3) when early autistic signs tend to fade away during development, and (4) when comorbidities are prominent. We argue that in certain cases, a diagnosis of ASD may not be the most suitable, timely, or helpful medical act and provide recommendations for clinical practice when facing such situations.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée