Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 20/08/2021 12:59

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Ginny Russell, Sal Stapley, Tamsin Newlove‐Delgado, Andrew Salmon, Rhianna White, Fiona Warren, Anita Pearson, Tamsin Ford (2022). Time trends in autism diagnosis over 20 years: a UK population‐based cohort study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 63(6), 674-682. Wiley.

Date de publication
19/08/2021
Identifiant
10.1111/jcpp.13505
Auteurs
Ginny Russell, Sal Stapley, Tamsin Newlove‐Delgado, Andrew Salmon, Rhianna White, Fiona Warren, Anita Pearson, Tamsin Ford
Source
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Détails
63(6), 674-682
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Background Autism spectrum disorder is a diagnosis that is increasingly applied; however, previous studies have conflicting findings whether rates of diagnosis rates continue to grow in the UK. This study tested whether the proportion of people receiving a new autism diagnosis has been increasing over a twenty‐year period, both overall and by subgroups. Method Population‐based study utilizing the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) primary care database, which contains patients registered with practices contributing data to the CPRD between 1998 and 2018 (N = 6,786,212 in 1998 to N = 9,594,598 in 2018). 65,665 patients had a diagnosis of autism recorded in 2018. Time trend of new (incident) cases of autism diagnosis was plotted for all, and stratified by gender, diagnostic subtypes, and developmental stage: infancy and preschool, 0–5 years old; childhood, 6–11 years old; adolescence, 12–19 years old; adults, over 19 years old. Results There was a 787%, exponential increase in recorded incidence of autism diagnoses between 1998 and 2018; R 2 = 0.98, exponentiated coefficient = 1.07, 95% CI [1.06, 1.08], p <.001. The increase in diagnoses was greater for females than males (exponentiated interaction coefficient = 1.02, 95% CI [1.01, 1.03], p <.001) and moderated by age band, with the greatest rises in diagnostic incidence among adults (exponentiated interaction coefficient = 1.06, 95% CI [1.04, 1.07], p <.001). Conclusions Increases could be due to growth in prevalence or, more likely, increased reporting and application of diagnosis. Rising diagnosis among adults, females and higher functioning individuals suggest augmented recognition underpins these changes.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée