Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 21/07/2021 03:37

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Nick Haslam, Ekaterina Vylomova, Sean C. Murphy, Sarah J. Wilson (2022). The Neuroscientification of Psychology: The Rising Prevalence of Neuroscientific Concepts in Psychology From 1965 to 2016. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(2), 519-529. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
20/07/2021
Identifiant
10.1177/1745691621991864
Auteurs
Nick Haslam, Ekaterina Vylomova, Sean C. Murphy, Sarah J. Wilson
Source
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Détails
17(2), 519-529
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

The apparent convergence of psychology and brain science has been the subject of both celebration and critique, but it has never been systematically charted. We examined historical trends in the representation of neuroscientific concepts in a corpus of 798,402 psychology journal articles published over the past half century, from 1965 to 2016. A dictionary of 522 uniquely neuroscience-related terms was developed, and the percentage of article abstracts in which at least one term appeared was calculated for each year. This percentage grew from 9.15% to 16.45% over the study period, whereas the percentage containing a subset of 199 terms containing the prefix “neur-” rose much more steeply, from 2.30% to 10.06%. From the mid-1970s, the growing representation of neuroscience in psychology was linear. Proportions were highest among journals covering neuropsychology and physiological psychology and behavioral neuroscience, lowest in those covering social psychology and developmental and educational psychology, and intermediate in those covering experimental and cognitive psychology and clinical psychology. The steepest rises were found in social and clinical psychology journals. Changes in the most salient neuroscientific terms revealed historical shifts in technology, topic, and anatomical focus, which may contribute to our understanding of relationships among mind, brain, and behavior.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée