Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 07/05/2021 04:23

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

1 réponse intégrée de Michelle Dawson

07/05/2021 04:28

Note: examples of "behaviors that challenge" in autistic children provided by the authors: "destructive behavior, aggression towards self & others, frustrated vocalisations, non-compliance, avoidance & reassurance seeking"?

Voir la réponse sur Twitter/X

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Tony Charman, Melanie Palmer, Dominic Stringer, Victoria Hallett, Joanne Mueller, Renee Romeo, Joanne Tarver, Juan Paris Perez, et al. (2021). A Novel Group Parenting Intervention for Emotional and Behavioral Difficulties in Young Autistic Children: Autism Spectrum Treatment and Resilience (ASTAR): A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(11), 1404-1418. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
novembre 2021
Identifiant
10.1016/j.jaac.2021.03.024
Auteurs
Tony Charman, Melanie Palmer, Dominic Stringer, Victoria Hallett, Joanne Mueller, Renee Romeo, Joanne Tarver, Juan Paris Perez, Lauren Breese, Megan Hollett, Thomas Cawthorne, Janet Boadu, Fernando Salazar, Mark O’Leary, Bryony Beresford, Martin Knapp, Vicky Slonims, Andrew Pickles, Stephen Scott, Emily Simonoff
Source
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Détails
60(11), 1404-1418
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

ObjectiveTo examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a group behavioral parenting intervention for emotional and behavioral problems (EBPs) in young autistic children.MethodThis was a feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial comparing a 12-week group behavioral parenting intervention (Predictive Parenting) to an attention control (Psychoeducation). Parents of 62 autistic children 4 to 8 years of age were randomized to Predictive Parenting (n = 31) or Psychoeducation (n = 31). The primary outcome was a blinded observational measure of child behaviors that challenge. Secondary outcomes were observed child compliance and parenting behaviors; parent- and teacher-reported child EBPs; self-reported parenting practices, stress, self-efficacy, and well-being. Cost-effectiveness was also explored.ResultsRecruitment, retention, completion of measures, treatment fidelity, and parental satisfaction were high for both interventions. There was no group difference in primary outcome: mean log of rate 0.18 lower (d, 90% CI = −0.44 to 0.08) in Predictive Parenting. Differences in rates of child compliance (0.44, 90% CI = 0.11 to 0.77), facilitative parenting (0.63, 90% CI = 0.33 to 0.92) and parent-defined target symptom change (−0.59, 90% CI −0.17 to −1.00) favored Predictive Parenting. There were no differences on other measures. Predictive Parenting was more expensive than Psychoeducation, with a low probability of being more cost-effective.ConclusionFeasibility was demonstrated. There was no evidence from this pilot trial that Predictive Parenting resulted in reductions in child EBPs beyond those seen following Psychoeducation; in addition, the effect size was small, and it was more expensive. However, it showed superiority for child compliance and facilitative parenting with moderate effect sizes. Future, definitive studies should evaluate whether augmented or extended intervention would lead to larger improvements.Clinical trial registration informationAutism Spectrum Treatment and Resilience (ASTAR); https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN91411078. To examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a group behavioral parenting intervention for emotional and behavioral problems (EBPs) in young autistic children. This was a feasibility pilot randomized controlled trial comparing a 12-week group behavioral parenting intervention (Predictive Parenting) to an attention control (Psychoeducation). Parents of 62 autistic children 4 to 8 years of age were randomized to Predictive Parenting (n = 31) or Psychoeducation (n = 31). The primary outcome was a blinded observational measure of child behaviors that challenge. Secondary outcomes were observed child compliance and parenting behaviors; parent- and teacher-reported child EBPs; self-reported parenting practices, stress, self-efficacy, and well-being. Cost-effectiveness was also explored. Recruitment, retention, completion of measures, treatment fidelity, and parental satisfaction were high for both interventions. There was no group difference in primary outcome: mean log of rate 0.18 lower (d, 90% CI = −0.44 to 0.08) in Predictive Parenting. Differences in rates of child compliance (0.44, 90% CI = 0.11 to 0.77), facilitative parenting (0.63, 90% CI = 0.33 to 0.92) and parent-defined target symptom change (−0.59, 90% CI −0.17 to −1.00) favored Predictive Parenting. There were no differences on other measures. Predictive Parenting was more expensive than Psychoeducation, with a low probability of being more cost-effective. Feasibility was demonstrated. There was no evidence from this pilot trial that Predictive Parenting resulted in reductions in child EBPs beyond those seen following Psychoeducation; in addition, the effect size was small, and it was more expensive. However, it showed superiority for child compliance and facilitative parenting with moderate effect sizes. Future, definitive studies should evaluate whether augmented or extended intervention would lead to larger improvements.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée