Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 30/01/2021 03:20

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Claudia Massaccesi, Alexander Groessing, Lisa A Rosenberger, Helena Hartmann, Michela Candini, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Francesca Frassinetti, Giorgia Silani (2021). Neural Correlates of Interpersonal Space Permeability and Flexibility in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cerebral Cortex, 31(6), 2968-2979. Oxford University Press (OUP).

Date de publication
29/01/2021
Identifiant
10.1093/cercor/bhaa404
Auteurs
Claudia Massaccesi, Alexander Groessing, Lisa A Rosenberger, Helena Hartmann, Michela Candini, Giuseppe di Pellegrino, Francesca Frassinetti, Giorgia Silani
Source
Cerebral Cortex
Détails
31(6), 2968-2979
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Previous research indicates that the size of interpersonal space at which the other is perceived as intrusive (permeability) and the ability to adapt interpersonal distance based on contextual factors (flexibility) are altered in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). However, the neurophysiological basis of these alterations remains poorly understood. To fill this gap, we used fMRI and assessed interpersonal space preferences of individuals with ASD before and after engaging in cooperative and non-cooperative social interactions. Compared to matched controls, ASDs showed lower comfort in response to an approaching confederate, indicating preference for larger interpersonal space in autism (altered permeability). This preference was accompanied by reduced activity in bilateral dorsal intraparietal sulcus (dIPS) and left fusiform face area (FFA), regions previously shown to be involved in interpersonal space regulation. Furthermore, we observed differences in effective connectivity among dIPS, FFA, and amygdala in ASDs compared to controls, depending on the level of experienced comfort. No differences between groups were observed in interpersonal space regulation after an experienced social interaction (flexibility). Taken together, the present findings suggest that a dysregulation of the activity and connectivity of brain areas involved in interpersonal space processing may contribute to avoidance of physical proximity and social impairments in ASD.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée