Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 19/12/2020 03:59

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Xueqin Qian, Karrie Shogren, Omolola A. Odejimi, Todd Little (2022). Differences in Self-Determination Across Disability Categories: Findings From National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 32(4), 245-256. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
16/12/2020
Identifiant
10.1177/1044207320964396
Auteurs
Xueqin Qian, Karrie Shogren, Omolola A. Odejimi, Todd Little
Source
Journal of Disability Policy Studies
Détails
32(4), 245-256
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Researchers have established variability in self-determination scores across disability groups, but most nationally representative research has used data collected over a decade ago from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2 (NLTS2). To provide an updated analysis of differences in characteristics of self-determination (i.e., autonomy, psychological empowerment, self-realization) across disability groups, this study analyzed data from the recently completed National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012 (NLTS2012). The authors tested measurement equivalence across seven disability groups: high-incidence disabilities (learning disabilities, emotional disturbances, speech or language impairments, and other health impairments), sensory disabilities (visual and hearing impairment), multiple disabilities (multiple disabilities and deaf-blindness), intellectual disability, traumatic brain injury, orthopedic impairments, and autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Students in the multiple disabilities, intellectual disability, and ASD groups showed lower self-determination scores compared with other disability groups. Greater variability was also found in scores among these groups. Implications for assessment research practice, and policy are highlighted.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée