Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 22/11/2020 13:28

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Blythe A. Corbett, Jessica M. Schwartzman, Erin J. Libsack, Rachael A. Muscatello, Matthew D. Lerner, Grace L. Simmons, Susan W. White (2021). Camouflaging in Autism: Examining Sex‐Based and Compensatory Models in Social Cognition and Communication. Autism Research, 14(1), 127-142. Wiley.

Date de publication
21/11/2020
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.2440
Auteurs
Blythe A. Corbett, Jessica M. Schwartzman, Erin J. Libsack, Rachael A. Muscatello, Matthew D. Lerner, Grace L. Simmons, Susan W. White
Source
Autism Research
Détails
14(1), 127-142
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Camouflaging refers to behavioral adaptations that individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), especially females, use to mask symptoms during social situations. Compensation is a component of camouflaging in which an individual's observed behavior is considerably better than actual ability. The study explored diagnostic, sex‐based, and compensatory differences using the Contextual Assessment of Social Skills (CASS). The sample included 161 youth 10:0‐to‐16:11 years (115 males, 46 females). T‐tests were performed based on sex (female, male) or High (good ADOS + poor Theory of Mind (TOM)) compared to Low (poor ADOS + poor TOM) Compensation groups. Comparisons were examined for Social Affect (SA), Restricted Repetitive Behavior, (RRB), IQ, social behavior (Positive Affect, Overall Involvement) and communication (Vocal Expression, Gestures). Females exhibited fewer RRB t (158) = 3.05, P = 0.003, d = 0.54. For the CASS, females evidenced more Vocal Expressiveness t (157) = −2.03, P = 0.05, d = 0.35, which corroborates sex‐based differences in the literature. Compensation group differences indicated the High compared to Low group showed stronger Social and Communication behaviors on the CASS for Vocal Expression t (72) = 2.56, P = 0.01, d = 0.62, and overall rapport t (72) = 2.36, P = 0.02, d = 0.56. Several differences were observed when the groups were stratified based on level of compensation, with the High compensation participants showing stronger social engagement and communication behaviors. Findings may inform efforts to understand camouflaging, compensation, and clinical practices for male and female adolescents with ASD. A more nuanced consideration of camouflaging alongside compensation models reveals subtle differences in cognition, behavior, and affect that may reflect underlying profiles of challenge and strength in youth with ASD. Lay Summary Camouflaging refers to ways individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), especially females, mask symptoms. Compensation occurs when a person's observed behavior appears more typical than what would be expected based on underlying ability and symptoms. The study explored camouflaging and compensation differences in 161 youth with ASD. Findings suggest sex‐based differences with females showing better vocal expression. However, several compensation differences were observed with the High compensators showing stronger social communication and rapport. A more nuanced consideration of camouflaging using compensation models reveal subtle differences in underlying challenge and strength.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée