Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 25/09/2020 03:56

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Tom Arthur, Sam Vine, Mark Brosnan, Gavin Buckingham (2020). Predictive sensorimotor control in autism. Brain, 143(10), 3151-3163. Oxford University Press (OUP).

Date de publication
25/09/2020
Identifiant
10.1093/brain/awaa243
Auteurs
Tom Arthur, Sam Vine, Mark Brosnan, Gavin Buckingham
Source
Brain
Détails
143(10), 3151-3163
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Autism spectrum disorder has been characterized by atypicalities in how predictions and sensory information are processed in the brain. To shed light on this relationship in the context of sensorimotor control, we assessed prediction-related measures of cognition, perception, gaze and motor functioning in a large general population (n = 92; Experiment 1) and in clinically diagnosed autistic participants (n = 29; Experiment 2). In both experiments perception and action were strongly driven by prior expectations of object weight, with large items typically predicted to weigh more than equally-weighted smaller ones. Interestingly, these predictive action models were used comparably at a sensorimotor level in both autistic and neurotypical individuals with varying levels of autistic-like traits. Specifically, initial fingertip force profiles and resulting action kinematics were both scaled according to participants’ pre-lift heaviness estimates, and generic visual sampling behaviours were notably consistent across groups. These results suggest that the weighting of prior information is not chronically underweighted in autism, as proposed by simple Bayesian accounts of the disorder. Instead, our results cautiously implicate context-sensitive processing mechanisms, such as precision modulation and hierarchical volatility inference. Together, these findings present novel implications for both future scientific investigations and the autism community.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée