Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 24/09/2020 00:42

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Gabrielle E. Reimann, Catherine Walsh, Kelsey D. Csumitta, Patrick McClure, Francisco Pereira, Alex Martin, Michal Ramot (2020). Insufficient Eye Tracking Data Leads to Errors in Evaluating Typical and Atypical Fixation Preferences. openRxiv.

Date de publication
22/09/2020
Identifiant
10.1101/2020.09.21.306621
Auteurs
Gabrielle E. Reimann, Catherine Walsh, Kelsey D. Csumitta, Patrick McClure, Francisco Pereira, Alex Martin, Michal Ramot
Type de référence
preprint
Éditeur
openRxiv
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Eye tracking provides insights into social processing and its deficits in disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD), especially in conjunction with dynamic, naturalistic stimuli. However, reliance on manual stimuli segmentation severely limits scalability. We assessed how the amount of available data impacts individual reliability of fixation preference for different facial features, and the effect of this reliability on between-group differences. We trained an artificial neural network to segment 22 Hollywood movie clips (7410 frames). We then analyzed fixation preferences in typically developing participants and participants with ASD as we incrementally introduced movie data for analysis. Although fixations were initially variable, results stabilized as more data was added. Additionally, while those with ASD displayed significantly fewer face-centered fixations (p <.001), they did not differ in eye or mouth fixations. Our results highlight the validity of treating fixation preferences as a stable individual trait, and the risk of misinterpretation with insufficient data.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée