Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 18/09/2020 05:22

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Daniel Yon, Carl Bunce, Clare Press (2020). Illusions of control without delusions of grandeur. Cognition, 205, 104429. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
décembre 2020
Identifiant
10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104429
Auteurs
Daniel Yon, Carl Bunce, Clare Press
Source
Cognition
Détails
205, 104429
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

We frequently experience feelings of agency over events we do not objectively influence - so-called 'illusions of control'. These illusions have prompted widespread claims that we can be insensitive to objective relationships between actions and outcomes, and instead rely on grandiose beliefs about our abilities. However, these illusory biases could instead arise if we are highly sensitive to action-outcome correlations, but attribute agency when such correlations emerge simply by chance. We motion-tracked participants while they made agency judgements about a cursor that could be yoked to their actions or follow an independent trajectory. A combination of signal detection analysis, reverse correlation methods and computational modelling indeed demonstrated that 'illusions' of control could emerge solely from sensitivity to spurious action-outcome correlations. Counterintuitively, this suggests that illusions of control could arise because agents have excellent insight into the relationships between actions and outcomes in a world where causal relationships are not perfectly deterministic.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée