Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Twitter/X le 17/09/2020 10:20

Twitter/X Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Bahar Tunçgenç, Carolyn Koch, Amira Herstic, Inge-Marie Eigsti, Stewart Mostofsky (2020). Mimicry is associated with procedural learning, not social bonding, neural systems in autism. openRxiv.

Date de publication
16/09/2020
Identifiant
10.1101/2020.09.16.299370
Auteurs
Bahar Tunçgenç, Carolyn Koch, Amira Herstic, Inge-Marie Eigsti, Stewart Mostofsky
Type de référence
preprint
Éditeur
openRxiv
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Mimicry facilitates social bonding throughout the lifespan. Mimicry impairments in autism spectrum conditions (ASC) are widely reported, including differentiation of the brain networks associated with its social bonding and learning functions. This study examined associations between volumes of brain regions associated with social bonding versus procedural skill learning, and mimicry of gestures during a naturalistic interaction in ASC and neurotypical (NT) children. Consistent with predictions, results revealed reduced mimicry in ASC relative to the NT children. Mimicry frequency was negatively associated with autism symptom severity. Mimicry was predicted predominantly by the volume of procedural skill learning regions in ASC, and by bonding regions in NT. Further, bonding regions contributed significantly less to mimicry in ASC than in NT, while the contribution of learning regions was not different across groups. These findings suggest that associating mimicry with skill learning, rather than social bonding, may partially explain observed communication difficulties in ASC.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée