Overview of the results from the analysis of the citation corpus extracted from Thérapie Autisme publications

Return to the project page

This page summarizes the distribution of citation verification scores, the types of sources in the corpus, and the bibliographic elements most often confirmed or problematic.

Audited citations

533

Corpus sources

  • Blog: 112 citations
  • Instagram: 183 citations
  • Study: 75 citations
  • Tool bibliography: 163 citations

Distribution of general correspondence levels between scientific citations and identified references

This chart summarizes the overall level of concordance between the citations collected and the scientific references that were identified. Each segment corresponds to a score class. The greener the segment, the more the cited information agrees with the reference found; the redder it is, the more distant or problematic the citation appears.

Audited citations: 533
0-29 % (107)
30-59 % (87)
60-79 % (82)
80-89 % (28)
90-100 % (229)

Score-level distribution by bibliographic element

Each bar represents 100% of the assessable citations for a given bibliographic element. The colors use the same levels as the general correspondence score. Element-level scores are calculated from the comparison between the citation and the identified reference; an element that is not provided or not assessable is not counted in that element bar. Overall period: from 12/03/2025 to 13/06/2026

Authors: 533
0-29 % (116)
30-59 % (30)
60-79 % (4)
90-100 % (383)
Year: 530
0-29 % (164)
60-79 % (53)
90-100 % (313)
Title: 533
0-29 % (143)
30-59 % (72)
60-79 % (36)
80-89 % (13)
90-100 % (269)
Journal: 308
0-29 % (127)
60-79 % (4)
80-89 % (1)
90-100 % (176)
DOI: 33
0-29 % (17)
90-100 % (16)

Distribution of general correspondence levels by source type

Each column represents 100% of the citations for one source type. The colors show the same general score levels as in the previous pie chart. For the three tool bibliographies, documents treated as base references are displayed separately from the other references listed in each tool bibliography. Periods by source: BIBLIO.OUTILS: 03/06/2025 -> 27/08/2025; BLOG: 05/06/2025 -> 13/06/2026; ETUDE: 13/11/2025 -> 13/11/2025; INSTAGRAM: 12/03/2025 -> 09/06/2026

All sources

Blog: 112
0-29 % (14)
30-59 % (21)
60-79 % (15)
80-89 % (3)
90-100 % (59)
Instagram: 183
0-29 % (46)
30-59 % (36)
60-79 % (29)
80-89 % (11)
90-100 % (61)
Study: 75
0-29 % (17)
30-59 % (11)
60-79 % (20)
90-100 % (27)
Tool bibliography: 163
0-29 % (30)
30-59 % (19)
60-79 % (18)
80-89 % (14)
90-100 % (82)

Bibliographic documents for tools sold by Thérapie Autisme

CDNAA-R base references: 6
30-59 % (1)
60-79 % (1)
80-89 % (1)
90-100 % (3)
CDNAA-R bibliography: 38
0-29 % (5)
30-59 % (1)
60-79 % (4)
80-89 % (2)
90-100 % (26)
ISPA base references: 5
30-59 % (1)
90-100 % (4)
ISPA bibliography: 84
0-29 % (23)
30-59 % (13)
60-79 % (10)
80-89 % (11)
90-100 % (27)
PCIPS base references: 5
0-29 % (1)
30-59 % (1)
60-79 % (1)
90-100 % (2)
PCIPS bibliography: 25
0-29 % (1)
30-59 % (2)
60-79 % (2)
90-100 % (20)

Overall score analysis for Instagram citations

Each square represents a reference cited in an Instagram post. The color indicates the general correspondence score with the identified reference: red for low correspondence, green for high correspondence. The number displayed in each square is the reference ID. Overall period: from 12/03/2025 to 13/06/2026

325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507
0-29 % (46)
30-59 % (36)
60-79 % (29)
80-89 % (11)
90-100 % (61)

Distribution of correspondence levels between cited titles and identified titles

This chart shows the distribution of correspondences between the cited title and the title of the identified scientific study. Each segment groups cases into a similarity class, ranging from “no significant words in common” to “almost identical titles”. The measure is the Jaccard index applied to significant words in the two titles after normalization: case, accents, punctuation, FR/EN stopwords, ASD/ASC, singular/plural, compound words and exclusion of overly generic domain words. Overall period: from 12/03/2025 to 13/06/2026

Sources analyzed: 533
Titles almost unrelated (0-29 %) (143)
Heavily modified titles (30-59 %) (72)
Partially similar titles (60-79 %) (36)
Close titles (80-89 %) (13)
Almost identical titles (90-100 %) (269)

DOI presence and irregularity analysis

A DOI absent from the citation is not an irregularity; the irregularity concerns DOI values that are provided but divergent. Overall period: from 12/03/2025 to 13/06/2026

Citations with or without a provided DOI

DOI not provided: 498
DOI provided: 35
DOI not provided (498)
DOI provided (35)

Quality of verified DOI values

Correct: 16
Erroneous: 17
Correct (16)
Erroneous (17)

2 DOI values were provided but not included in the verified DOI quality view because they were partial or not assessable.