Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 19 Aug 2025 12:44

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Criticism of ABA "conflicts with over half a century of evidence that ABA supports autonomy and enhances wellbeing of people with autism..."? link.springer.com/article/10.1... that ABA "evidence" features rock-bottom standards of science & ethics, is awash in COIs, ignores harms to autistics, etc

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Jason Travers, Matt Tincani (2025). In Defense of Applied Behavior Analysis and Evidence-Based Practice. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 48(3), 641-653. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
18 Aug 2025
Identifier
10.1007/s40614-025-00468-y
Authors
Jason Travers, Matt Tincani
Source
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Details
48(3), 641-653
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract This commentary critically appraises attacks on applied behavior analysis (ABA) from outside and—increasingly—within the field. Commonly repeated attacks are that ABA is coercive and suppresses individual identity, aligns with the medical model, causes trauma, and, in more extreme cases, constitutes abuse. We illustrate how these claims are based on unfounded criticism and longstanding myths about ABA and stand in direct contrast to the empirical foundations of behavior analysis. We also highlight how such criticism conflicts with over half a century of evidence that ABA supports autonomy and enhances wellbeing of people with autism and developmental disabilities. We call for self-reflection among well-meaning behavior analysts who repeat such criticisms and greater attention to evidence-based practice.

Study authors in this cited reference