Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 19/08/2025 12:44

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Criticism of ABA "conflicts with over half a century of evidence that ABA supports autonomy and enhances wellbeing of people with autism..."? link.springer.com/article/10.1... that ABA "evidence" features rock-bottom standards of science & ethics, is awash in COIs, ignores harms to autistics, etc

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Jason Travers, Matt Tincani (2025). In Defense of Applied Behavior Analysis and Evidence-Based Practice. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 48(3), 641-653. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
18/08/2025
Identifiant
10.1007/s40614-025-00468-y
Auteurs
Jason Travers, Matt Tincani
Source
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Détails
48(3), 641-653
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract This commentary critically appraises attacks on applied behavior analysis (ABA) from outside and—increasingly—within the field. Commonly repeated attacks are that ABA is coercive and suppresses individual identity, aligns with the medical model, causes trauma, and, in more extreme cases, constitutes abuse. We illustrate how these claims are based on unfounded criticism and longstanding myths about ABA and stand in direct contrast to the empirical foundations of behavior analysis. We also highlight how such criticism conflicts with over half a century of evidence that ABA supports autonomy and enhances wellbeing of people with autism and developmental disabilities. We call for self-reflection among well-meaning behavior analysts who repeat such criticisms and greater attention to evidence-based practice.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée