Perdus dans l’ombre : réflexions sur le côté obscur de la coproduction

Titre original en anglais : Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production

Sources de métadonnées utilisées pour cette référence

OpenAlex Crossref OpenCitations
En savoir plus sur les sources utilisées

Williams, O., Sarre, S., Papoulias, C., Knowles, S., Robert, G., Beresford, P., Rose, D., Carr, S., Kaur, M., & Palmer, V. (2020). Lost in the shadows: reflections on the dark side of co-production. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1), 43-43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00558-0

Date de publication: 07/05/2020 Ajout dans AutiHub: 18/07/2026 Type: Article Langue de l’article: Anglais
Source OpenAlex Source éditeur (DOI) Texte intégral

Cette publication est intégrée dans AutiHub via :

Auteurs

Auteur·ices des publications
10
Auteur·ices de la publication identifié·es comme autistes
0 / 10 (0,0 %)
  1. Oli Williams
  2. Sophie Sarre
  3. Constantina Papoulias
  4. Sarah Knowles
  5. Glenn Robert
  1. Peter Beresford
  2. Diana Rose
  3. Sarah Carr
  4. Meerat Kaur
  5. Victoria Palmer

Résumé

Résumé Cet article répond au commentaire d’Oliver et al., « Le côté obscur de la coproduction : les coûts l’emportent-ils sur les bénéfices pour la recherche en santé ? », récemment publié dans Health Research Policy and Systems (2019, 17:33). Le commentaire original soulève certaines questions importantes sur la manière et le moment de coproduire la recherche en santé, notamment en mettant en évidence divers coûts professionnels pour les personnes impliquées. Cependant, nous identifions quatre limites connexes dans leur analyse, comme suit : (1) l’adoption d’une définition problématiquement extensive de la coproduction qui ne reconnaît pas les caractéristiques essentielles distinguant la coproduction d’une collaboration plus large ; (2) une forte attention accordée aux justifications technocratiques de la coproduction de la recherche et une négligence relative des justifications démocratiques ; (3) la transposition de préoccupations légitimes relatives à la collaboration entre chercheurs et praticiens au travail avec les patients, les usagers des services et les citoyens marginalisés ; et (4) la présentation de mauvaises pratiques comme un défaut inhérent, voire comme le « côté obscur », de la coproduction sans prendre en compte l’influence corruptrice de facteurs contextuels au sein de la recherche universitaire qui facilitent et même encouragent de telles mauvaises pratiques. Les limites du commentaire peuvent être considérées comme reflétant l’usage contemporain plus large du terme « coproduction ». Nous décrivons ce phénomène comme la « cobiquité » – un appétit apparent pour les pratiques de recherche participative et une attention accrue portée au travail en partenariat, combinés à l’émergence connexe d’une pléthore de mots en « co », favorisant une confusion des significations et des pratiques issues de différentes traditions collaboratives. Ce phénomène conduit couramment à une appropriation abusive du terme « coproduction ». Notre principale motivation est de remédier à cette imprécision et à l’effet préjudiciable qu’elle exerce sur les efforts visant à permettre la coproduction avec des groupes marginalisés et défavorisés. Nous concluons qu’Oliver et al. s’approchent trop près du « problème » de la « coproduction », ne voyant que le côté obscur plutôt que ce qui projette les ombres. Nous mettons en garde contre une vision aussi restrictive et plaidons pour un examen plus approfondi des facteurs structurels qui expliquent largement l’échec du monde universitaire à accueillir et promouvoir le potentiel égalitaire et utilitariste de la recherche coproduite.

Abstract This article is a response to Oliver et al.’s Commentary ‘The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?’ recently published in Health Research Policy and Systems (2019, 17:33). The original commentary raises some important questions about how and when to co-produce health research, including highlighting various professional costs to those involved. However, we identify four related limitations in their inquiry, as follows: (1) the adoption of a problematically expansive definition of co-production that fails to acknowledge key features that distinguish co-production from broader collaboration; (2) a strong focus on technocratic rationales for co-producing research and a relative neglect of democratic rationales; (3) the transposition of legitimate concerns relating to collaboration between researchers and practitioners onto work with patients, service users and marginalised citizens; and (4) the presentation of bad practice as an inherent flaw, or indeed ‘dark side’, of co-production without attending to the corrupting influence of contextual factors within academic research that facilitate and even promote such malpractice. The Commentary’s limitations can be seen to reflect the contemporary use of the term ‘co-production’ more broadly. We describe this phenomenon as ‘cobiquity’ – an apparent appetite for participatory research practice and increased emphasis on partnership working, in combination with the related emergence of a plethora of ‘co’ words, promoting a conflation of meanings and practices from different collaborative traditions. This phenomenon commonly leads to a misappropriation of the term ‘co-production’. Our main motivation is to address this imprecision and the detrimental impact it has on efforts to enable co-production with marginalised and disadvantaged groups. We conclude that Oliver et al. stray too close to ‘the problem’ of ‘co-production’ seeing only the dark side rather than what is casting the shadows. We warn against such a restricted view and argue for greater scrutiny of the structural factors that largely explain academia’s failure to accommodate and promote the egalitarian and utilitarian potential of co-produced research.

Bibliographie citée par cette référence

Les références citées sont importées depuis des sources externes de métadonnées lorsqu’elles sont disponibles. La liste peut être partielle.

4 entrées de bibliographie citée n’ont pas pu être entièrement enrichies à partir des métadonnées DOI.
Crossref: introuvable (2) · DataCite: introuvable (2)
  1. Birgitte Ravn Olesen , Helle Merete Nordentoft (2013). Walking the talk? A Micro-Sociological Approach to the Co-production of Knowledge and Power in Action Research .
    Type: Autre DOI: 10.1688/1861-9916_ijar_2013_01_olesen OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W16594364 Crossref: introuvable DataCite: introuvable
    OpenAlex
  2. Elinor Ostrom (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development . World Development, 24(6), 1073-1087. Elsevier BV.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(96)00023-x OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1996760592
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  3. Jill Maben , Cath Taylor , Jeremy Dawson , Mary Leamy , Imelda McCarthy , Ellie Reynolds et al. (2018). A realist informed mixed-methods evaluation of Schwartz Center Rounds® in England . Health Services and Delivery Research, 6(37), 1-260. National Institute for Health and Care Research.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3310/hsdr06370 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2901761262
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  4. Simeen Mahmud (2007). Spaces for Participation in Health Systems in Rural Bangladesh: The Experience of Stakeholder Community Groups . Dans OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).
    Type: Chapitre de livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W228710648
    OpenAlex
  5. Kathryn Oliver , Anita Kothari , Nicholas Mays (2019). The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Health Research Policy and Systems, 17(1), 33. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2925672674
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  6. Elinor Ostrom (1990). Governing the Commons . Cambridge University Press.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511807763 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4233654598
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  7. Edgar S. Cahn (2004). No more throw-away people: the co-production imperative .
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W602137246
    OpenAlex
  9. Dana Gore , Anita Kothari (2012). Social determinants of health in Canada: Are healthy living initiatives there yet? A policy analysis . International Journal for Equity in Health, 11(1), 41. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-41 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2108899912
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  10. Andréa Cornwall , Vera Schattan P. Coelho (2006). Spaces for Change?: The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas .
    Type: Article OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1528810664
    OpenAlex
  11. Tony Bovaird (2007). Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services . Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846-860. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2120875227
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  12. Alison Faulkner (2005). Institutional conflict: the state of play in adult acute psychiatric wards . The Journal of Adult Protection, 7(4), 6-12. Emerald.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1108/14668203200500020 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1997881846
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  13. Sarah Carr (2018). Who owns co-production? Dans Social Policy First Hand: An International Introduction to Participatory Welfare (pp. 74-83). Policy Press.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.51952/9781447332558.ch007 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4289754330
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  14. Charlton, James I. (1998). Nothing about us without us: disability oppression and empowerment . Choice Reviews Online, 36(01), 36-0640-36-0640. American Library Association.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.5860/choice.36-0640 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1568037033
    Crossref OpenAlex
  15. (s. d.). Black A. The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research? Open Reviewer’s Report. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2019. https://health-policy-systems.biomedcentral.com/articles/10 . 1186/s12961-019-0432-3/open-peer-review.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  16. V Pestoff (2013). New Public Governance, the Third Sector, and Co-Production . Routledge.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.4324/9780203152294 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1668764474
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  17. Graham P. Martin , Sarah McNicol , Sarah Chew (2013). Towards a new paradigm in health research and practice? Journal of Health Organization and Management, 27(2), 193-208. Emerald.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1108/14777261311321770 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1571503495
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  18. Jenelle Clarke , Justin Waring , Stephen Timmons (2019). The challenge of inclusive coproduction: The importance of situated rituals and emotional inclusivity in the coproduction of health research projects . Social Policy & Administration, 53(2), 233-248. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/spol.12459 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2901981426
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  19. Vololona Rabeharisoa , Tiago Moreira , Madeleine Akrich (2014). Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society . BioSocieties, 9(2), 111-128. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.2 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2323692869
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  20. Alistair Hewison , Nicola Gale , Jonathan Shapiro (2012). Co-production in research: some reflections on the experience of engaging practitioners in health research . Public Money & Management, 32(4), 297-302. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2012.691311 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2085811989
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  21. Miranda Fricker (2007). Epistemic Injustice . Oxford University PressOxford.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4252633962
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  22. Chris Lorenz (2012). If You're So Smart, Why Are You under Surveillance? Universities, Neoliberalism, and New Public Management . Critical Inquiry, 38(3), 599-629. University of Chicago Press.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1086/664553 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1975710169
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  23. Graham P. Martin (2008). ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare . Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(1), 35-54. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01027.x OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2088865368
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  24. Jason Glynos , Ewen Speed (2012). Varieties of co-production in public services: time banks in a UK health policy context . Critical Policy Studies, 6(4), 402-433. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2012.730760 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1976035326
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  25. Steve Martin (2010). Co-production of social research: strategies for engaged scholarship . Public Money & Management, 30(4), 211-218. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/09540962.2010.492180 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2072287655
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  26. P. Bower , Sylia Wilson , N. Mathers (2007). Short report: How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Family Practice, 24(6), 601-603. Oxford University Press (OUP).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmm051 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2131015924
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  27. Benjamin Ewert , Adalbert Evers (2014). An Ambiguous Concept: On the Meanings of Co-production for Health Care Users and User Organizations? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 425-442. Cambridge University Press (CUP).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s11266-012-9345-2 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1979290740
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  28. ID Graham (2014). Turning Knowledge into Action: Practical Guidance on How to Do Integrated Knowledge Translation Research . Turning Knowledge into Action: Practical Guidance on How to Do Integrated Knowledge Translation Research.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  29. Aled Jones , Daniel Kelly (2014). Whistle‐blowing and workplace culture in older peoples' care: qualitative insights from the healthcare and social care workforce . Sociology of Health & Illness, 36(7), 986-1002. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12137 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2008438441
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  30. Marianna Fotaki (2015). Co-Production Under the Financial Crisis and Austerity . Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(4), 433-438. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/1056492615579790 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1987460316
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  31. Elinor Ostrom , Roger B. Parks , Gordon P. Whitaker , Stephen L. Percy (1978). The Public Service Production Process: A Framework for Analyzing Police Services . Policy Studies Journal, 7(s1), 381-381. Wiley.
    Type: Résumé DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1978.tb01782.x OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2060327123
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  32. Derek Wall (2018). Elinor Ostrom's Rules for Radicals . University of Chicago Press Economics Books.
    Type: Article OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3139946472
    Crossref OpenAlex
  33. Hamid Dabashi (2015). Can Non-Europeans Think? Zed Books.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.5040/9781350218840 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2798277428
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  34. Peter Beresford (2019). Public Participation in Health and Social Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge . Frontiers in Sociology, 3, 41. Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2018.00041 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2907060594
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  35. Dan Robotham , Til Wykes , Diana Rose , Lisa Doughty , Sally Strange , Joanne Neale et al. (2016). Service user and carer priorities in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health . Journal of Mental Health, 25(3), 185-188. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167862 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2337229036
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  36. Christopher Kliewer (1999). Nothing About Us Without Us: Disability Oppression and Empowerment . Mental Retardation, 37(2), 168-169.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1352/0047-6765(1999)037 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2009768307 Crossref: introuvable DataCite: introuvable
    OpenAlex
  38. Gordon P. Whitaker (1980). Coproduction: Citizen Participation in Service Delivery . Public Administration Review, 40(3), 240. JSTOR.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.2307/975377 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2016851153
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  39. Giulio Moini (2011). How participation has become a hegemonic discursive resource: towards an interpretivist research agenda . Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 149-168. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576524 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2019035729
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  40. Locock Louise , Boaz Annette (2019). Drawing straight lines along blurred boundaries: qualitative research, patient and public involvement in medical research, co-production and co-design . Evidence & Policy, 15(3), 409-421. Bristol University Press.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1332/174426419x15552999451313 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2945372905
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  41. (2018). Social Policy First Hand: An International Introduction to Participatory Welfare . Social Policy First Hand: An International Introduction to Participatory Welfare.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  42. Loïc Plé , Rubén Chumpitaz Cáceres (2010). Not always co‐creation: introducing interactional co‐destruction of value in service‐dominant logic . Journal of Services Marketing, 24(6), 430-437. Emerald.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1108/08876041011072546 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2066240089
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  43. ES Cahn (2000). No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative. No More Throw-Away People: The Co-Production Imperative..
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  44. Michelle Farr (2018). Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes . Critical Social Policy, 38(4), 623-644. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/0261018317747444 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2771768155
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  45. V. Welch , M. Doull , M. Yoganathan , J. Jull , M. Boscoe , S. E. Coen et al. (2017). Reporting of sex and gender in randomized controlled trials in Canada: a cross-sectional methods study . Research Integrity and Peer Review, 2(1), 15-15. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/s41073-017-0039-6 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2736138949
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  46. Nick Black (2006). The Cooksey review of UK health research funding . BMJ, 333(7581), 1231-1232. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39059.444120.80 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2080361588
    OpenAlex
  47. Gill Green (2016). Power to the people: To what extent has public involvement in applied health research achieved this? Research Involvement and Engagement, 2(1), 28-28. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/s40900-016-0042-y OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2507195581
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  48. Cassidy R Sugimoto , Yong-Yeol Ahn , Elise Smith , Benoit Macaluso , Vincent Larivière (2019). Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis . The Lancet, 393(10171), 550-559. Elsevier BV.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32995-7 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2911537195
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  49. (s. d.). Hickey G, Richards T, Sheehy J. Co-production from proposal to paper. Nature. 2018; https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06861-9 . Accessed 1 Mar 2020.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  50. Jeannette Pols (2014). Knowing Patients . Science, Technology, & Human Values, 39(1), 73-97. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/0162243913504306 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2122888231
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  51. Mary Madden , Ewen Speed (2017). Beware Zombies and Unicorns: Toward Critical Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research in a Neoliberal Context . Frontiers in Sociology, 2, 7. Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2017.00007 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2620416402
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  52. Brian N. Williams , Seong-Cheol Kang , Japera Johnson (2016). (Co)-Contamination as the Dark Side of Co-Production: Public value failures in co-production processes . Public Management Review, 18(5), 692-717. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2015.1111660 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2290711797
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  53. Theo Lorenc , Kathryn Oliver (2014). Adverse effects of public health interventions: a conceptual framework . Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 68(3), 288-290. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203118 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2122853676
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  54. Diana Rose (2018). Participatory research: real or imagined . Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 53(8), 765-771. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s00127-018-1549-3 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2809544673
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  55. Nicky Lambert , Sarah Carr (2018). ‘Outside the Original Remit’: Co‐production in UK mental health research, lessons from the field . International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 27(4), 1273-1281. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/inm.12499 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2809565046
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  56. Gill Green , Tracey Johns (2019). Exploring the Relationship (and Power Dynamic) Between Researchers and Public Partners Working Together in Applied Health Research Teams . Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 20-20. Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00020 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2931731007
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  57. Chris Bonell , Farah Jamal , G J Melendez-Torres , Steven Cummins (2015). ‘Dark logic’: theorising the harmful consequences of public health interventions . Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 69(1), 95-98. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/jech-2014-204671 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2149770183
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  58. Bram Verschuere , Daphne Vanleene , Trui Steen , Taco Brandsen (2018). Democratic Co-Production . Dans Democratic Co-Production: Concepts and Determinants. Co-Production and Co-Creation (pp. 243-251). Routledge.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.4324/9781315204956-38 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2785945072
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  59. Barry C. Field , Elinor Ostrom (1992). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action . Land Economics, 68(3), 354. University of Wisconsin Press.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.2307/3146384 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2175723801
    OpenAlex
  60. Sofia Kjellström , Kristina Areskoug Josefsson , Boel Andersson Gäre , Ann-Christine Andersson , Marlene Ockander , Jacob Käll et al. (2019). Exploring, measuring and enhancing the coproduction of health and well-being at the national, regional and local levels through comparative case studies in Sweden and England: the ‘Samskapa’ research programme protocol . BMJ Open, 9(7), e029723. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029723 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2965609152
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  61. Diana Rose , Emma Perry , Sarah Rae , Naomi Good (2017). Service user perspectives on coercion and restraint in mental health . BJPsych. International, 14(3), 59-61. Royal College of Psychiatrists.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1192/s2056474000001914 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2782380946
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  62. Keri Facer , Bryony Enright (2016). Creating Living Knowledge: The Connected Communities Programme, community-university partnerships and the participatory turn in the production of knowledge .
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2465415290
    Crossref OpenAlex
  63. Helen Kara (2017). Identity and power in co-produced activist research . Qualitative Research, 17(3), 289-301. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/1468794117696033 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2602245101
    AutiHub · Centre de documentation Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  64. Trui Steen , Taco Brandsen , Bram Verschuere (2018). The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production . Dans The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production: Seven Evils. Co-Production and Co-Creation (pp. 284-293). Routledge.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.4324/9781315204956-45 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2787231996
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  65. Cris Shore (2008). Audit culture and Illiberal governance . Anthropological Theory, 8(3), 278-298. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/1463499608093815 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2327507397
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  66. (s. d.). Scottish Co-production Network. 100 Stories of Co-production. 2019. http://www.coproductionscotland.org.uk/learning/section/100-stories/ . Accessed 12 Dec 2019.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  67. Rachel Matthews , Constantina Papoulias (2019). Toward Co-productive Learning? The Exchange Network as Experimental Space . Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 36-36. Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00036 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2942211097
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  68. Graham P Martin , Pam Carter , Mike Dent (2018). Major health service transformation and the public voice: conflict, challenge or complicity? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 23(1), 28-35. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/1355819617728530 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2750116398
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  69. Jijian Voronka (2016). The Politics of ‘people with lived experience’ Experiential Authority and the Risks of Strategic Essentialism . Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology, 23(3-4), 189-201. Project MUSE.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1353/ppp.2016.0017 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2588922535
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  70. Sarah Carr , M. Patel (2016). Practical guide: progressing transformative co-production in mental health .
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2531543040
    Crossref OpenAlex
  71. BR Olesen (2013). Olesen BR, Nordentoft HM. Walking the talk? A micro-sociological approach to the co-production of knowledge and power in action research. Int J Action Res. 2013;9(1):67–94. Int J Action Res, 9(1), 67.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  72. S Mahmud (2007). Spaces for Change?: The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas . Spaces for Change?: The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas, 55.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  73. Paul Batalden (2018). Getting more health from healthcare: quality improvement must acknowledge patient coproduction—an essay by Paul Batalden . BMJ, 362, k3617. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k3617 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2892062809
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  74. Derek Wall (2017). Elinor Ostrom's Rules for Radicals . Pluto Press.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.2307/j.ctt1vz4931 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2602783894
    OpenAlex
  76. Constantina Papoulias (2018). Showing the Unsayable: Participatory Visual Approaches and the Constitution of ‘Patient Experience’ in Healthcare Quality Improvement . Health Care Analysis, 26(2), 171-188. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s10728-017-0349-3 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2766191941
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  77. D Cooksey (2006). A Review of UK Health Research Funding . A Review of UK Health Research Funding.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  78. Sophie Sarre , Jill Maben , Peter Griffiths , Rosemary Chable , Glenn Robert (2019). The 10-year impact of a ward-level quality improvement intervention in acute hospitals: a multiple methods study . Health Services and Delivery Research, 7(28), 1-172. National Institute for Health and Care Research.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3310/hsdr07280 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2969858087
    Crossref OpenAlex
  79. Caroline Criado Perez (2020). Invisible Women: Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men .
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3036574361
    Crossref OpenAlex
  80. Peter Beresford (2015). Reimagining Adult Social Care: Evidence Informed Practice, Evidence Review . Reimagining Adult Social Care: Evidence Informed Practice, Evidence Review.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  81. Gary Hickey , Tessa Richards , Jeff Sheehy (2018). Co-production from proposal to paper . Nature, 562(7725), 29-31. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1038/d41586-018-06861-9 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2894579547
    OpenAlex
  82. Roman Kislov , Paul Wilson , Sarah Knowles , Ruth Boaden (2018). 5 The art of compromise: co-production of evidence in applied health research . Workshops, A3.1-A3. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.
    Type: Autre DOI: 10.1136/bmjebm-2018-111024.5 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2896220147
    OpenAlex
  83. R Kislov (2018). Kislov R, Wilson P, Knowles S, Boaden R. 5 The art of compromise: co-production of evidence in applied health research. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2018;23(Suppl_1):A3. BMJ Evid Based Med, 23(Suppl_1), A3.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  84. C Needham (2009). Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Social Care Institute for Excellence . Co-production: an emerging evidence base for adult social care transformation. Social Care Institute for Excellence.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  85. Oli Williams (2020). Decentering healthcare networks . Decentering healthcare networks.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  86. Gill Green , Annette Boaz , Maria Stuttaford (2019). Editorial: Public Participation in Health Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge . Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 73-73. Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00073 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2984362559
    OpenAlex
  87. Oli Williams , Glenn Robert , Graham P. Martin , Esmée Hanna , Jane O’Hara (2020). Is Co-production Just Really Good PPI? Making Sense of Patient and Public Involvement and Co-production Networks . Dans Organizational Behaviour in Healthcare (pp. 213-237). Springer International Publishing.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-40889-3_10 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3041883443
    OpenAlex
  88. Nerys Williams (2020). Invisible Women Exposing Data Bias in a World Designed for Men . Occupational Medicine, 70(9), 690-690. Oxford University Press (OUP).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqaa038 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3117072286
    OpenAlex