Utiliser le design thinking pour impliquer des étudiants autistes dans la conception participative d'une boîte à outils en ligne destinée à faciliter la transition vers l'enseignement supérieur

Titre original en anglais : Using design thinking to engage autistic students in participatory design of an online toolkit to help with transition into higher education

Fabri, M., Andrews, P. C., & Pukki, H. (2016). Using design thinking to engage autistic students in participatory design of an online toolkit to help with transition into higher education. Journal of Assistive Technologies, 10(2), 102-114. https://doi.org/10.1108/jat-02-2016-0008

Date de publication: 27/05/2016 Ajout dans AutiHub: 06/07/2026 Type: Article Langue de l’article: Anglais

Cette publication est intégrée dans AutiHub via :

Auteurs

Auteur·ices des publications
3
Auteur·ices de la publication identifié·es comme autistes
1 / 3 (33,3 %)

Résumé

Objectif – L'objectif de cet article est de réfléchir à l'implication de jeunes personnes autistes dans la conception participative de la boîte à outils en ligne Autism&Uni. L'objectif de cette boîte à outils est de fournir aux étudiants autistes des informations et des stratégies pour faire face aux difficultés qu'ils peuvent rencontrer lorsqu'ils entrent dans l'enseignement supérieur. L'étude s'ajoute aux recherches existantes sur la conception participative en prenant en considération les besoins spécifiques et les contributions des personnes autistes ayant une intelligence moyenne ou supérieure, compétentes sur le plan académique et généralement capables de s'exprimer, un groupe qui a jusqu'à présent reçu une attention limitée. Conception/méthodologie/approche – La recherche a utilisé une approche de design thinking en cinq étapes et a impliqué de multiples parties prenantes à différents moments. L'article couvre l'ensemble du processus, en accordant une attention particulière aux deux dernières étapes de prototypage et de test. Au cours de trois ateliers de conception participative, des personnes autistes ont agi en tant que co-concepteurs et co-créateurs. Résultats – Les ateliers ont été efficaces pour impliquer les participants dans diverses activités de conception et des discussions riches. Plusieurs hypothèses concernant les capacités et les préférences des personnes autistes ont été remises en question. Le design thinking s'est avéré être un cadre approprié pour impliquer ce groupe dans la création de solutions répondant à ses besoins. Limites de la recherche/implications – En raison du faible nombre de participants aux ateliers (11), les résultats de la recherche peuvent manquer de généralisabilité. De plus, le format des ateliers, qui met l'accent sur les activités de groupe, peut décourager certaines personnes autistes d'y participer. Des travaux supplémentaires sont nécessaires pour explorer cette question et confirmer les résultats rapportés. Implications pratiques – L'article offre des conseils pratiques sur la manière d'impliquer des personnes autistes dans des activités de co-conception. Implications sociales – La recherche contribue à une vision de l'autisme fondée sur les forces, plutôt qu'à une vision axée sur les déficits. Originalité/valeur – L'article offre de nouvelles perspectives sur les forces des personnes autistes dans des contextes de conception participative, en mettant l'accent sur les personnes autistes ayant une intelligence moyenne ou supérieure et capables de communiquer efficacement.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to reflect on engaging young autistic people in the participatory design of the Autism&Uni online toolkit. The purpose of the toolkit is to provide autistic students with information and strategies for dealing with the challenges they may encounter when entering higher education. The study adds to existing research on participatory design by considering the specific needs and contributions of autistic people who are of average or higher intelligence, academically competent and generally articulate, a group that has received limited attention hitherto. Design/methodology/approach – The research used a five-step design thinking approach and engaged multiple stakeholders at different points. The paper covers the whole process, paying particular attention to the final two steps of prototyping and testing. During three participatory design workshops, autistic people acted as co-designers and co-creators. Findings – The workshops were effective in engaging participants in various design activities and rich discussions. Several assumptions about capabilities and preferences of autistic people were challenged. Design thinking proved a suitable framework for involving this group in the creation of solutions that serve their needs. Research limitations/implications – Because of the low number of workshop participants (11), research results may lack generalisability. Also, the workshop format with its focus on group activities may discourage some autistic people to take part. Further work is needed to explore this and to confirm the reported findings. Practical implications – The paper offers practical advice regarding how to involve autistic people in co-design activities. Social implications – The research contributes to a strength-based view of autism, rather than one that focuses on deficits. Originality/value – The paper provides new perspectives on the strengths of autistic people in participatory design settings, with a focus on those autistic people who are of average or higher intelligence and able to communicate effectively.

Bibliographie citée par cette référence

Les références citées sont importées depuis des sources externes de métadonnées lorsqu’elles sont disponibles. La liste peut être partielle.

Vue d’ensemble de l’inclusion dans la bibliographie

Ces indicateurs décrivent la bibliographie citée importée pour cette publication. Les métriques de références citées utilisent le total des références citées comme dénominateur. Les métriques d’auteurices cité·es indiquent si elles utilisent toutes les occurrences d’auteurices cité·es ou seulement les occurrences rattachées à des auteurices déjà intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub. Ils utilisent les rattachements mis en cache entre les auteurices cité·es et les auteurices intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub. Dernier calcul : 16/08/2026 11:31.

Références citées
51
Nombre total de références citées intégrées pour cette publication.
Références citées avec un·e auteur·ice identifié·e comme autiste
0 / 51 (0,0 %)
Occurrences d’auteur·ices cité·es identifié·es comme autistes
0 / 80 (0,0 %)
Parmi les occurrences rattachées à des auteurices intégré·es à la base de données AutiHub : 0 / 17 (0,0 %). Auteurices cité·es distinct·es identifié·es comme autistes : 0 / 75 (0,0 %).
Occurrences citées rattachées à la base AutiHub
17 / 80 (21,2 %)
Auteurices cité·es distinct·es rattaché·es : 15 / 75 (20,0 %)
Occurrences rattachées, non identifiées comme autistes
17 / 17 (100,0 %)
Parmi les seules occurrences rattachées. Sur l’ensemble des occurrences d’auteurices cité·es : 17 / 80 (21,2 %). Auteurices cité·es distinct·es rattaché·es, non identifié·es comme autistes : 15 / 15 (100,0 %).
  1. john Brooke (1996). SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale . Dans Usability Evaluation In Industry (pp. 207-212). CRC Press.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.1201/9781498710411-35 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W19399978
    OpenAlex
  2. Katharine S. Adams , Briley E. Proctor (2010). Adaptation to College for Students with and without Disabilities: Group Differences and Predictors. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22(3), 166.
    Type: Article OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2136395696
    Crossref OpenAlex
  3. Kate Plaisted Grant , Greg Davis (2009). Perception and apperception in autism: rejecting the inverse assumption . Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1522), 1393-1398. The Royal Society.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  4. (1996). Usability Evaluation In Industry . CRC Press.
    OpenAlex
  5. AHEAD (2012), Survey on the Participation Rates of Students with Disabilities in Higher Education for the Academic Year 2011/2012, AHEAD Educational Press, Blackrock, Dublin.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  6. Viktoria Lyons , Michael Fitzgeral (2013). Critical Evaluation of the Concept of Autistic Creativity . Dans Recent Advances in Autism Spectrum Disorders - Volume I. InTech.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.5772/54465 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1577225714
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  7. Catherine Best , Shruti Arora , Fiona Porter , Martin Doherty (2015). The Relationship Between Subthreshold Autistic Traits, Ambiguous Figure Perception and Divergent Thinking . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 4064-4073. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  8. Alsop, R. (2016), “Are autistic individuals the best workers around?”, BBC Capital, available at: www.bbc.com/capital/story/20160106-model-employee-are-autistic-individuals-the-best-workers-around (accessed 1 February 2016).
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  9. Isabelle Simard , David Luck , Laurent Mottron , Thomas A. Zeffiro , Isabelle Soulières (2015). Autistic fluid intelligence: Increased reliance on visual functional connectivity with diminished modulation of coupling by task difficulty . NeuroImage: Clinical, 9, 467-478. Elsevier BV.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  10. González Moreno, Andrés Santiago (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders . American Psychiatric Association.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  11. Joyce Davidson , Victoria L. Henderson (2010). ‘Coming out’ on the spectrum: autism, identity and disclosure . Social & Cultural Geography, 11(2), 155-170. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  12. Andrew Withell , Neil Haigh (2013). Developing Design Thinking Expertise in Higher Education . DRS // CUMULUS 2013. Design Research Society.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  13. Nuria Aresti-Bartolome , Begonya Garcia-Zapirain (2014). Technologies as Support Tools for Persons with Autistic Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review . International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(8), 7767-7802. MDPI AG.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  14. Katherine McDonald , Erin Stack (2016). You say you want a revolution: An empirical study of community-based participatory research with people with developmental disabilities . Disability and Health Journal, 9(2), 201-207. Elsevier BV.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  15. Autism &Uni (2016), “A guide to best practice in supporting higher education students on the autism spectrum”, Vols 1-3, available at: www.autism-uni.org/bestpractice (accessed 31 March 2016).
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  16. Timo Lorenz , Kathrin Heinitz (2014). Aspergers – Different, not less: Occupational strengths and job interests of individuals with Asperger's syndrome. Unpublished.
    OpenCitations
  17. Deborah Russo Jameson (2007). Self-Determination and Success Outcomes of Two-Year College Students with Disabilities . Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 26-46. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  18. Nancy Bagatell (2010). From Cure to Community: Transforming Notions of Autism . Ethos, 38(1), 33-55. Wiley.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  19. Andrée‐Anne S. Meilleur , Patricia Jelenic , Laurent Mottron (2015). Prevalence of Clinically and Empirically Defined Talents and Strengths in Autism . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(5), 1354-1367. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  20. Luke Beardon , Nicola Martin , I Woolsey (2009). What do students with Asperger syndrome or highfunctioning autism want at college and university? (in their own words) . Good Autism Practice, 10(2), 35.
    Type: Article OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2800455132
    Crossref OpenAlex
  21. Éric Fombonne (2009). Epidemiology of Pervasive Developmental Disorders . Pediatric Research, 65(6), 591-598. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  22. Ann Simmeborn Fleischer , Margareta Adolfsson , Mats Granlund (2013). Students with disabilities in higher education – perceptions of support needs and received support . International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 36(4), 330-338. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health).
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  23. Brooke, J. (1996), “SUS: a ‘quick and dirty’ usability scale”, in Jordan, P. W., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. A. and McClelland, I. L. (Eds), Usability Evaluation in Industry, Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 189-94.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  24. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation . Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 29.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  25. Bryan M. Ness (2013). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning for College Students with Asperger Syndrome: Exploring the “Strategies for College Learning” Model . Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(4), 356-377. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  26. Manuel Madriaga , Dan Goodley (2010). Moving beyond the minimum: socially just pedagogies and Asperger’s syndrome in UK higher education . International Journal of Inclusive Education, 14(2), 115-131. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  27. Brugha, T., Cooper, S. A., McManus, S., Purdon, S., Smith, J., Scott, F. J., Spiers, N. and Tyrer, F. (2012), “Estimating the prevalence of autism spectrum conditions in adults: extending the 2007 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, Leeds, available at: www.hscic.gov.uk/catalogue/PUB05061/esti-prev-auti-ext-07-psyc-morb-surv-rep.pdf (accessed 31 March 2016).
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  28. Ann Simmeborn Fleischer (2012). Alienation and struggle: everyday student-life of three male students with Asperger Syndrome . Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 14(2), 177-194. Stockholm University Press.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  29. Horst W. J. Rittel , Melvin M. Webber (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning . Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155-169. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  30. (2013). Conducting research with individuals who have intellectual disabilities: ethical and practical implications for qualitative research . Journal on Developmental Disabilities, 19(2), 14.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  31. Tim Brown , Jocelyn Wyatt (2010). Design Thinking for Social Innovation . Development Outreach, 12(1), 29-43. World Bank.
    OpenAlex OpenCitations
  32. d.school (2010), “Design thinking bootcamp bootleg”, Stanford, CA, available at: http://dschool.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/BootcampBootleg2010v2SLIM.pdf (accessed 31 March 2016).
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  33. Shi Min Liew , Nishta Thevaraja , Ryan Y. Hong , Iliana Magiati (2015). The Relationship Between Autistic Traits and Social Anxiety, Worry, Obsessive–Compulsive, and Depressive Symptoms: Specific and Non-specific Mediators in a Student Sample . Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(3), 858-872. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  34. Ken Gobbo , Solvegi Shmulsky (2012). Classroom Needs of Community College Students with Asperger's Disorder and Autism Spectrum Disorders . Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(1), 40-46. Informa UK Limited.
    OpenAlex OpenCitations
  35. Lászlό Erdődi , Renée Lajiness-O’Neill , Thomas A. Schmitt (2013). Learning Curve Analyses in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Are Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Truly Visual Learners? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(4), 880-890. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  36. Deborah E. Griswold , Gena P. Barnhill , Brenda Smith Myles , Taku Hagiwara , Richard L. Simpson (2002). Asperger Syndrome and Academic Achievement . Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 17(2), 94-102. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  37. MARTIN MAGUIRE (2001). Methods to support human-centred design . International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 587-634. Elsevier BV.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  38. Jaci C. Huws , Robert S. P. Jones (2008). Diagnosis, disclosure, and having autism: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the perceptions of young people with autism . Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 33(2), 99-107. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  39. Alinda Gillott , P.J. Standen (2007). Levels of anxiety and sources of stress in adults with autism . Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 11(4), 359-370. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  40. Tara J. Glennon (2001). The stress of the university experience for students with Asperger syndrome . WORK: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 17(3), 183-190. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex
  41. Timo Lorenz , Kathrin Heinitz (2014). Aspergers – Different, Not Less: Occupational Strengths and Job Interests of Individuals with Asperger's Syndrome . PLoS ONE, 9(6), e100358. Public Library of Science (PLoS).
    Crossref OpenAlex
  42. (2014). Classroom needs of community college students with asperger’s disorder and Autism spectrum disorders . Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 36(1), 40.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  43. Elizabeth B.-N. Sanders , Pieter Jan Stappers (2008). Co-creation and the new landscapes of design . CoDesign, 4(1), 5-18. Informa UK Limited.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  44. HESA (2013), “Table 14 – first year UK domiciled HE students by level of study, sex, mode of study, and disability 2012/13”, Cheltenham, available at: www.hesa.ac.uk/dox/pressOffice/sfr210/071277_student_sfr210_1314_table_14.xlsx (accessed 31 March 2016).
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  45. IDEO (2015), The Field Guide to Human-Centred Design, IDEO, San Francisco, CA.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  46. Lorcan Kenny , Caroline Hattersley , Bonnie Molins , Carole Buckley , Carol Povey , Elizabeth Pellicano (2016). Which terms should be used to describe autism? Perspectives from the UK autism community . Autism, 20(4), 442-462. SAGE Publications.
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  47. (2008). Towards an inclusive environment for university students who have Asperger syndrome (AS) . Journal of Inclusive Practice in Further and Higher Education, 1(1), 3.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  48. Millen, L., Edlin-White, R. and Cobb, S. (2010), “The development of educational collaborative virtual environments for children with autism”, Proceedings of the 5th Cambridge Workshop on Universal Access and Assistive Technology, Cambridge, 23-25 March.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  49. Ratcliffe, R. (2014), “Helping students with Asperger’s prepare for university life”, The Guardian, available at: www.theguardian.com/education/2014/sep/09/students-aspergers-ready-university-life (accessed 1 February 2016).
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  50. UK Design Council (n.d.), “Design methods for developing services”, Keeping Connected Business Challenge, available at: https://connect.innovateuk.org/web/3338201/service-design-methods (accessed 31 March 2016).
    Type: Autre
    Crossref