Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 12/12/2024 12:09

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Decades too late, a bit more on ABA-based harms in the form of "resurgence" during functional communication training, including "several occasions in which challenging behavior resurged to twice or four times the levels seen in baseline" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... autism-relevant, free

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Arielle R. Marshall, Daniel R. Mitteer, Brian D. Greer, Catherine B. Kishel (2025). On the prevalence and magnitude of resurgence during delay‐and‐denial tolerance teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 58(1), 151-163. Wiley.

Date de publication
11/12/2024
Identifiant
10.1002/jaba.2930
Auteurs
Arielle R. Marshall, Daniel R. Mitteer, Brian D. Greer, Catherine B. Kishel
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Détails
58(1), 151-163
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Resurgence is the recurrence of target behavior (e.g., challenging behavior) during a worsening of reinforcement conditions (e.g., increases in response effort, decreases in alternative reinforcement). Previous studies have examined the prevalence and magnitude of resurgence during functional communication training implemented with discriminative stimuli. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to analyze the magnitude and prevalence of resurgence during delay‐and‐denial tolerance teaching. Similar to previous studies with discriminative stimuli, resurgence occurred for most participants and in about one third of transitions. When resurgence was present, challenging behavior increased to approximately 26% of baseline levels. Resurgence was less likely to occur during response‐effort manipulations (i.e., complexity teaching, tolerance‐response teaching) and was most likely to occur during increases in delays that ended following the passage of time rather than a response criterion. We discuss implications for treatment refinements and future treatment‐relapse research.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée