Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 12 Dec 2024 12:09

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post

Decades too late, a bit more on ABA-based harms in the form of "resurgence" during functional communication training, including "several occasions in which challenging behavior resurged to twice or four times the levels seen in baseline" onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... autism-relevant, free

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Arielle R. Marshall, Daniel R. Mitteer, Brian D. Greer, Catherine B. Kishel (2025). On the prevalence and magnitude of resurgence during delay‐and‐denial tolerance teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 58(1), 151-163. Wiley.

Publication date
11 Dec 2024
Identifier
10.1002/jaba.2930
Authors
Arielle R. Marshall, Daniel R. Mitteer, Brian D. Greer, Catherine B. Kishel
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Details
58(1), 151-163
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Resurgence is the recurrence of target behavior (e.g., challenging behavior) during a worsening of reinforcement conditions (e.g., increases in response effort, decreases in alternative reinforcement). Previous studies have examined the prevalence and magnitude of resurgence during functional communication training implemented with discriminative stimuli. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to analyze the magnitude and prevalence of resurgence during delay‐and‐denial tolerance teaching. Similar to previous studies with discriminative stimuli, resurgence occurred for most participants and in about one third of transitions. When resurgence was present, challenging behavior increased to approximately 26% of baseline levels. Resurgence was less likely to occur during response‐effort manipulations (i.e., complexity teaching, tolerance‐response teaching) and was most likely to occur during increases in delays that ended following the passage of time rather than a response criterion. We discuss implications for treatment refinements and future treatment‐relapse research.

Study authors in this cited reference