Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 23/10/2024 11:32

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

In papers published since 2014, reported echolalia prevalence in autism ranges from 22.9%-91% (from a total N of 11-209)?--rapid review, free link.springer.com/article/10.1... included studies "varied widely in terms of the way echolalia was understood, defined, operationalised, and measured"

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Rebecca Sutherland, Lucy Bryant, Julia Dray, Jacqueline Roberts (2024). Prevalence of Echolalia in Autism: A Rapid Review of Current Findings and a Journey Back to Historical Data. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 11(4), 171-183. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
17/10/2024
Identifiant
10.1007/s40474-024-00311-0
Auteurs
Rebecca Sutherland, Lucy Bryant, Julia Dray, Jacqueline Roberts
Source
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Détails
11(4), 171-183
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Purpose of Review The aim of this rapid review was to understand how current research describes and quantifies the prevalence of echolalia, generally described as the repetition of other’s speech, in autism. Recent Findings Five databases were searched for papers published in the last ten years (i.e., since 2014) that reported studies presenting new data regarding echolalia prevalence among autistic participants (11 studies), and studies presenting secondary prevalence figures based on prior research (11 studies). Primary echolalia prevalence estimates among children and youth ranged from 25 to 91%. Studies citing secondary statistics drew their prevalence from six population samples reported across nine papers from 1965 to 2014, with most studies citing research published in the 1960s. Summary Highly varied prevalence estimates and discrepant definitions of echolalia across studies reflects longstanding and entrenched problems regarding the ways that echolalia is defined and described. More research into echolalia prevalence and change across age and ability groups is needed to inform evidence-based supports for autistic people.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée