Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 23 Oct 2024 11:32

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

In papers published since 2014, reported echolalia prevalence in autism ranges from 22.9%-91% (from a total N of 11-209)?--rapid review, free link.springer.com/article/10.1... included studies "varied widely in terms of the way echolalia was understood, defined, operationalised, and measured"

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Rebecca Sutherland, Lucy Bryant, Julia Dray, Jacqueline Roberts (2024). Prevalence of Echolalia in Autism: A Rapid Review of Current Findings and a Journey Back to Historical Data. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 11(4), 171-183. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
17 Oct 2024
Identifier
10.1007/s40474-024-00311-0
Authors
Rebecca Sutherland, Lucy Bryant, Julia Dray, Jacqueline Roberts
Source
Current Developmental Disorders Reports
Details
11(4), 171-183
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Purpose of Review The aim of this rapid review was to understand how current research describes and quantifies the prevalence of echolalia, generally described as the repetition of other’s speech, in autism. Recent Findings Five databases were searched for papers published in the last ten years (i.e., since 2014) that reported studies presenting new data regarding echolalia prevalence among autistic participants (11 studies), and studies presenting secondary prevalence figures based on prior research (11 studies). Primary echolalia prevalence estimates among children and youth ranged from 25 to 91%. Studies citing secondary statistics drew their prevalence from six population samples reported across nine papers from 1965 to 2014, with most studies citing research published in the 1960s. Summary Highly varied prevalence estimates and discrepant definitions of echolalia across studies reflects longstanding and entrenched problems regarding the ways that echolalia is defined and described. More research into echolalia prevalence and change across age and ability groups is needed to inform evidence-based supports for autistic people.

Study authors in this cited reference