Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 27 Feb 2013 18:32

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Sander Van de Cruys, Lee de-Wit, Kris Evers, Bart Boets, Johan Wagemans (2013). Weak Priors versus Overfitting of Predictions in Autism: Reply to Pellicano and Burr (TICS, 2012). i-Perception, 4(2), 95-97. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
1 Jan 2013
Identifier
10.1068/i0580ic
Authors
Sander Van de Cruys, Lee de-Wit, Kris Evers, Bart Boets, Johan Wagemans
Source
i-Perception
Details
4(2), 95-97
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Pellicano and Burr (2012) argue that a Bayesian framework can help us understand the perceptual peculiarities in autism. We agree, but we think that their assumption of uniformly flat or equivocal priors in autism is not empirically supported. Moreover, we argue that any full account has to take into consideration not only the nature of priors in autism, but also how these priors are constructed or learned. We argue that predictive coding provides a more constrained framework that very naturally explains how priors are constructed in autism leading to strong, but overfitted, and non-generalizable predictions.

Study authors in this cited reference