DOI work
Fetched
Post
crossref
Sander Van de Cruys, Lee de-Wit, Kris Evers, Bart Boets, Johan Wagemans
(2013).
Weak Priors versus Overfitting of Predictions in Autism: Reply to Pellicano and Burr (TICS, 2012).
i-Perception, 4(2), 95-97.
SAGE Publications.
- Publication date
-
1 Jan 2013
- Identifier
-
10.1068/i0580ic
- Authors
-
Sander Van de Cruys,
Lee de-Wit,
Kris Evers,
Bart Boets,
Johan Wagemans
- Source
- i-Perception
- Details
- 4(2), 95-97
- Reference type
- article
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Metadata source
- crossref
Abstract
Pellicano and Burr (2012) argue that a Bayesian framework can help us understand the perceptual peculiarities in autism. We agree, but we think that their assumption of uniformly flat or equivocal priors in autism is not empirically supported. Moreover, we argue that any full account has to take into consideration not only the nature of priors in autism, but also how these priors are constructed or learned. We argue that predictive coding provides a more constrained framework that very naturally explains how priors are constructed in autism leading to strong, but overfitted, and non-generalizable predictions.
Study authors in this cited reference