Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 28 Jul 2026 12:23

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

"a tool to guide the rigorous appraisal of neurodiversity affirming
mental health research"? the tool assumes this research is beneficial (without assessing its benefits vs harms, risk of bias etc) & should be disseminated as policy, practice etc? journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... autism-relevant

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Erin Hoare, Matthew Harrison, Sarah Timperley, Jessica Riordan, Jessica Rowlings, Darren Hedley, Claire M Brown, Bindi Bennett, et al. (2026). Towards Aligned, Responsive, and Rigorous Appraisal of Neurodiversity Affirming Mental Health Research: The Neurodiversity Appraisal Tool (NeuDAT ). Neurodiversity, 4, 27546330261464728. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
16 Jul 2026
Identifier
10.1177/27546330261464728
Authors
Erin Hoare, Matthew Harrison, Sarah Timperley, Jessica Riordan, Jessica Rowlings, Darren Hedley, Claire M Brown, Bindi Bennett, Tayla John, Kisani Upward, Elizabeth M Weir, Lisa Olive, Kate Hall, Oliver R Runswick, Laura D Swettenham, Kristin McGinty-Minister
Source
Neurodiversity
Details
4, 27546330261464728
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

The concept of neurodiversity has gained rapid scholarly, clinical, and broad community momentum. This includes the inclusion of understanding neurodiversity approaches as a new mandated competency for Australian psychologists to gain and maintain registration to practice. Consensus regarding the core conceptual features and effective application of neurodiversity affirming principles in research is evolving, and the field lacks a standardized tool to guide the interpretation, appraisal, and assessment of neurodiversity affirming mental health research. This includes moving beyond narrow Western ontologies of neurodiversity that often prevail in contemporary scholarship. Moreover, policymakers require guidance on the creation of inclusive policies that are aligned with neurodiversity-affirming best practices, which include trauma-informed care and commitment to cultural responsivity. Above all, it is imperative that neurodivergent people and communities continuously benefit from, shape the priorities of, and remain centralized. This includes ensuring neurodiversity affirming approaches do not reinforce colonial assumptions about independence, productivity, and normative functioning. In this Community Perspective, we draw upon our collective researcher-clinician-lived-experience expertise to synthesize current neurodiversity conceptual evidence and distil key principles for the application to mental health research. The resulting Neurodiversity Appraisal Tool (NeuDAT ) is a qualitative instrument to guide clinicians, educators, policymakers, researchers, and other evidence consumers in appraising neurodiversity research.

Study authors in this cited reference