Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 12 Jun 2025 11:58

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

"if the evidence... supports the prioritization of assent in ABA, it does not follow that there would be any such thing as 'assent-based ABA.' There would only be ABA done better (with assent prioritized), and ABA done worse"? link.springer.com/article/10.1... on ABA brands, autism-relevant, free

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Jessica Graber, Abraham Graber (2025). Applied Behavior Analysis at a Crossroads: Reform, Branding, and the Future of Behavior Analysis. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 48(3), 577-588. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
11 Jun 2025
Identifier
10.1007/s40614-025-00462-4
Authors
Jessica Graber, Abraham Graber
Source
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Details
48(3), 577-588
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, public concerns about applied behavior analysis (ABA) have intensified. This article argues that foundational principles of ABA require behavior analysts to take seriously these concerns and actively work to improve our practices. We provide an overview of ongoing reform efforts and examine how these efforts have led to the emergence of distinct brands within the field. Although these reformist efforts signal a commitment to ethical progress, they also raise concerns about the proliferation of competing credentials, conferences, and professional affiliations, which could increase confusion among clients, practitioners, and policymakers. We argue that although branding within ABA may be an expected and ultimately benign response to shifting ethical and practical norms, it also carries the potential to faction reformist efforts and further divide the field, rather than promote our collective advancement toward ever-better practices. Thus, our goals are to: (1) raise awareness around the potentialities of siloing advancements under competing labels, and (2) suggest that an integrated approach synthesizing reformist insights into a cohesive framework may have the greatest impact on advancing the whole field’s understanding of best practice.

Study authors in this cited reference