Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 12/06/2025 11:58

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

"if the evidence... supports the prioritization of assent in ABA, it does not follow that there would be any such thing as 'assent-based ABA.' There would only be ABA done better (with assent prioritized), and ABA done worse"? link.springer.com/article/10.1... on ABA brands, autism-relevant, free

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Jessica Graber, Abraham Graber (2025). Applied Behavior Analysis at a Crossroads: Reform, Branding, and the Future of Behavior Analysis. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 48(3), 577-588. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
11/06/2025
Identifiant
10.1007/s40614-025-00462-4
Auteurs
Jessica Graber, Abraham Graber
Source
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Détails
48(3), 577-588
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract In recent years, public concerns about applied behavior analysis (ABA) have intensified. This article argues that foundational principles of ABA require behavior analysts to take seriously these concerns and actively work to improve our practices. We provide an overview of ongoing reform efforts and examine how these efforts have led to the emergence of distinct brands within the field. Although these reformist efforts signal a commitment to ethical progress, they also raise concerns about the proliferation of competing credentials, conferences, and professional affiliations, which could increase confusion among clients, practitioners, and policymakers. We argue that although branding within ABA may be an expected and ultimately benign response to shifting ethical and practical norms, it also carries the potential to faction reformist efforts and further divide the field, rather than promote our collective advancement toward ever-better practices. Thus, our goals are to: (1) raise awareness around the potentialities of siloing advancements under competing labels, and (2) suggest that an integrated approach synthesizing reformist insights into a cohesive framework may have the greatest impact on advancing the whole field’s understanding of best practice.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée