Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 10 Apr 2025 12:02

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

Behavior analysts (COIs) on the many ways functional analyses harm autistics link.springer.com/article/10.1... to mitigate the intended harms, "padded floors & walls"? "a paging system to alert the facility of potentially dangerous situations"? "electromagnetic locks on treatment room doors"? etc

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Katherine R. Brown, Casey Irwin Helvey, Michael P. Kranak, Abigail Lavin (2025). Functional Analysis Decision-Making Considerations. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 18(4), 1237-1254. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
9 Apr 2025
Identifier
10.1007/s40617-025-01057-w
Authors
Katherine R. Brown, Casey Irwin Helvey, Michael P. Kranak, Abigail Lavin
Source
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Details
18(4), 1237-1254
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Functional analysis (FA) is often considered an integral component of treating severe challenging behavior (e.g., aggression, self-injury). Given its essential nature, there are a growing number of publications aimed at supporting clinicians’ understanding of FA design and methodological refinements for addressing barriers to implementation. The current paper builds on previous work by offering a guide for clinicians new to FA implementation. In particular, guidance is provided on when and under what conditions to include specific FA test conditions and how to select a given methodology for a case. In addition, we provide an in-depth discussion on best practices for safe and ethical FAs, regardless of the chosen setting, implementer, or methodology.

Study authors in this cited reference