Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 10/04/2025 12:02

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Behavior analysts (COIs) on the many ways functional analyses harm autistics link.springer.com/article/10.1... to mitigate the intended harms, "padded floors & walls"? "a paging system to alert the facility of potentially dangerous situations"? "electromagnetic locks on treatment room doors"? etc

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Katherine R. Brown, Casey Irwin Helvey, Michael P. Kranak, Abigail Lavin (2025). Functional Analysis Decision-Making Considerations. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 18(4), 1237-1254. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
09/04/2025
Identifiant
10.1007/s40617-025-01057-w
Auteurs
Katherine R. Brown, Casey Irwin Helvey, Michael P. Kranak, Abigail Lavin
Source
Behavior Analysis in Practice
Détails
18(4), 1237-1254
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Functional analysis (FA) is often considered an integral component of treating severe challenging behavior (e.g., aggression, self-injury). Given its essential nature, there are a growing number of publications aimed at supporting clinicians’ understanding of FA design and methodological refinements for addressing barriers to implementation. The current paper builds on previous work by offering a guide for clinicians new to FA implementation. In particular, guidance is provided on when and under what conditions to include specific FA test conditions and how to select a given methodology for a case. In addition, we provide an in-depth discussion on best practices for safe and ethical FAs, regardless of the chosen setting, implementer, or methodology.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée