Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 13 Dec 2024 11:42

Back to posts Previous post Next post
Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post
Open original post
View on Bluesky

Information about the link integrated into the post

DOI work

Wendy C. Higgins, David M. Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, Robert M. Ross (2025). Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024). Clinical Psychology Review, 115, 102530. Elsevier BV.

More information

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Wendy C. Higgins, David M. Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, Robert M. Ross (2025). Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024). Clinical Psychology Review, 115, 102530. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
February 2025
Identifier
10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102530
Authors
Wendy C. Higgins, David M. Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, Robert M. Ross
Source
Clinical Psychology Review
Details
115, 102530
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Murphy and Hall (2024) present two criticisms of our review of construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Te…

Study authors in this cited reference

Open DOI Link to cited source