Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 13 Dec 2024 11:42

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post

Reiterating "that RMET scores are unsubstantiated, and thus uninterpretable" & again recommending "that researchers stop using the RMET as a measure of social cognitive ability and re-evaluate existing research findings based on RMET scores" www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... autism-relevant
View on Bluesky

Information about the link integrated into the post

DOI work

Wendy C. Higgins, David M. Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, Robert M. Ross (2025). Why most research based on the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test is unsubstantiated and uninterpretable: A response to Murphy and Hall (2024). Clinical Psychology Review, 115, 102530. Elsevier BV.

More information

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Publication date: February 2025
Identifier: 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102530
Authors: Wendy C. Higgins, David M. Kaplan, Eliane Deschrijver, Robert M. Ross
Source: Clinical Psychology Review
Details: 115, 102530
Reference type: article
Publisher: Elsevier BV
Metadata source: crossref

Abstract

Murphy and Hall (2024) present two criticisms of our review of construct validity evidence reporting practices for the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Te…

Study authors in this cited reference

Wendy C. Higgins (3 other cited references)
David M. Kaplan (3 other cited references)
Eliane Deschrijver (4 other cited references)
Robert M. Ross (4 other cited references)

Open DOI Link to cited source