Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 23 Oct 2020 01:05

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

1 integrated reply by Michelle Dawson

23 Oct 2020 01:21

Note: in the ABA literature, autistics (any age) are presumed to not learn from undergoing functional analyses. How often do they learn & what do they learn? We don't know because this is unlikely to be reported. So this account is rare

View reply on Twitter/X

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Natalie Andzik, Elle Smith, Nancy Neef (2022). Using a Token Economy to Treat Escape-Maintained Problem Behavior Without Extinction. Behavior Modification, 46(1), 128-146. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
21 Oct 2020
Identifier
10.1177/0145445520966762
Authors
Natalie Andzik, Elle Smith, Nancy Neef
Source
Behavior Modification
Details
46(1), 128-146
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

The use of extinction procedures when treating escape-maintained problem behavior can be undesirable and impractical for practitioners to use. To mitigate the risks associated with escape extinction, we explored the effectiveness of a delayed reinforcement token system without the use of extinction in school and home settings to treat escape-maintained problem behavior of students with autism spectrum disorder. In lieu of escape extinction (e.g., blocking), the researchers implemented a 30 s break contingent on problem behaviors and a token (to be exchanged at the end of the session) contingent on compliance. The results of a multiple probe design indicated substantial increases in compliance and reductions in problem behavior for all four participants. These findings suggest that extinction is not necessary to eliminate escape-maintained problem behavior in children with autism.

Study authors in this cited reference