Between Conformity and Creativity: A Feminist Autoethnography of AuDHD Identity and Professional Performance

This publication is included in the Autistic Autism Scholarship Project. one author of this publication is identified as autistic in the project.

About the autistic author marker

Seipel, J. M. (2026). Between Conformity and Creativity: A Feminist Autoethnography of AuDHD Identity and Professional Performance [Dissertation]. https://www.proquest.com/pqdtglobal1/dissertations-theses/between-conformity-creativity-feminist/docview/3334669041/sem-2

Publication date: 2026 Added to AutiHub: 21 Oct 2026 Type: Dissertation Article language: English

This publication is integrated into AutiHub through:

Authors

Publication authors
1
Publication authors identified as autistic
1 / 1 (100.0%)

Abstract

Neurodivergent women, particularly those with co-occurring autism and ADHD (AuDHD), are often missed by current diagnostic biases due to male-centered medical models and gendered socialization. This critical feminist autoethnography examines how neurotypical and gendered workplaces shape identity construction for a late-diagnosed neurodivergent woman navigating professional environments without diagnostic recognition. Drawing on feminist standpoint theory, dialogical self theory, and neurodivergent trait analysis frameworks, this study positions lived experience as epistemically valuable knowledge frequently excluded systematically from organizational research. Workplace narratives analyzed retrospectively serve as primary data, using evocative autoethnographic methods accessing internal cognition and otherwise invisible behaviors. Critical themes of image management through masking, self-medication, and progressive identity fragmentation across professional contexts are revealed. Identity reconstruction is catalyzed through late diagnosis, retrospective reframing, and a rejection of internalized self-stigma, precipitating a new understanding of neurological difference. This study demonstrates that autoethnography uniquely exposes invisible workplace experiences that may typically remain opaque using traditional interview methods. Implications are relevant to organizational support for late-diagnosed employees, methodological contributions of neurodivergent voices in scholarship, and to co-occurring neurodivergence as phenomenologically distinct. This study challenges deficit-based models, validates adaptations required to navigate neurotypical professional environments, and privileges epistemically marginalized positions in explicating lived experience.

Bibliography cited by this reference

Cited references are imported from external metadata sources when they are available. The list may be partial.

No cited bibliography is currently integrated for this reference. This does not necessarily mean that no bibliography exists.