Copying not Diagnosing: The Case of Hugh Blair of Borgue
This publication is included in the Autistic Autism Scholarship Project. one author of this publication is identified as autistic in the project.
About the autistic author markerSeymour, L. (2024). Copying not Diagnosing: The Case of Hugh Blair of Borgue. Disability Studies Quarterly, 43(2). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v43i2.8811
This publication is integrated into AutiHub through:
Authors
Abstract
This article re-evaluates the case of Hugh Blair of Borgue (1747-8) from the standpoint of neurodiversity pride. This case was brought by John Blair against his older brother the laird Hugh Blair of Borgue. John successfully argued that Hugh was an Idiot incapable of marriage. As a result, Hugh’s marriage to Nickie Mitchell was annulled and their children disinherited; John and his descendants now stood to inherit Hugh’s estates. Some modern criticism has suggested that Hugh was autistic. During the court case, Hugh’s life and way of behaving and communicating, were often painfully critiqued. Exploring an autistic reading of Hugh that emphasises his creativity and love of imitation, I argue that attempting to “diagnose” him with autism using modern diagnostic criteria can replicate some of the harsh judgements that the court made against him. I end by suggesting that, as Hugh loved to copy, we might spend some time in our lives imitating Hugh.
Bibliography cited by this reference
Cited references are imported from external metadata sources when they are available. The list may be partial.
No cited bibliography is currently integrated for this reference. This does not necessarily mean that no bibliography exists.