Whose Experiences Are Represented in Autism Research? Looking at Who Takes Part in Australian Autism Research and How They Are Described

This publication is included in the Autistic Autism Scholarship Project. one author of this publication is identified as autistic in the project.

About the autistic author marker

Adams, D., Walsh, M., Molnar, T., Simpson, K., Bury, S., Wiblen, H., & Paradisis, C. (2026). Whose Experiences Are Represented in Autism Research? Looking at Who Takes Part in Australian Autism Research and How They Are Described [Preprint]. Center for Open Science. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cw8nd_v2

Publication date: 14 Aug 2026 Added to AutiHub: 23 Sep 2026 Type: Preprint Article language: English

This publication is integrated into AutiHub through:

Authors

Publication authors
7
Publication authors identified as autistic
1 / 7 (14.3%)

Abstract

Despite a growing body of autism research, significant gaps remain regarding whose experiences are reported, necessitating a comprehensive assessment of representation across the evidence base. This systematic mapping review examined demographic reporting and representation of autistic participants in Australian autism research published between 2023 and 2025. Searches across 46 academic databases identified 517 Australian autism empirical research articles, of which 467 involved human participants and 272 included demographic data for autistic participants. Demographic reporting of included articles was examined using the PROGRESS-Plus framework alongside priority and intersectional groups identified in Australia's National Autism Strategy. Gender/sex and age were the most frequently reported characteristics, appearing in 89.3% and 74.6% of articles, respectively. In contrast, reporting for First Nations identity, cultural background, socioeconomic status, intellectual disability, communication profiles, sexual orientation+ status, and very high support needs were considerably less common. Eligibility criteria also shaped representation, with many studies requiring a formal autism diagnosis and some excluding participants based on English proficiency, English literacy, intellectual disability, communication profile, or non-speaking status. These findings indicate that many autistic participants remain demographically invisible in autism research, limiting the understanding of whose experiences underpin the evidence base. More consistent demographic reporting, clearer justification of exclusion criteria, and more accessible recruitment and participation methods are needed to support equity, transparency, and policy relevance in autism research. While this study focused on the Australian context, the findings may reflect broader challenges in demographic representation and reporting within autism research internationally.

Related publications

These links indicate preprints, protocols, published versions, or related records identified in AutiHub.

Other versions of the same publication

Bibliography cited by this reference

Cited references are imported from external metadata sources when they are available. The list may be partial.

No cited bibliography is currently integrated for this reference. This does not necessarily mean that no bibliography exists.