Mobilisation et implication efficaces des parties prenantes communautaires dans la coproduction de la recherche en santé mondiale

Titre original en anglais : Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research

Sources de métadonnées utilisées pour cette référence

OpenAlex Crossref OpenCitations
En savoir plus sur les sources utilisées

Tembo, D., Hickey, G., Montenegro, C., Chandler, D., Nelson, E., Porter, K., Dikomitis, L., Chambers, M., Chimbari, M. J., Mumba, N., Beresford, P., Ekiikina, P. O., Musesengwa, R., Staniszewska, S., Coldham, T., & Rennard, U. (2021). Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research. BMJ, 372, n178. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n178

Date de publication: 15/02/2021 Ajout dans AutiHub: 18/07/2026 Type: Article Langue de l’article: Anglais
Source OpenAlex Source éditeur (DOI) Texte intégral

Cette publication est intégrée dans AutiHub via :

Auteurs

Auteur·ices des publications
16
Auteur·ices de la publication identifié·es comme autistes
0 / 16 (0,0 %)
  1. Doreen Tembo
  2. Gary Hickey
  3. Cristián Montenegro
  4. David Chandler
  5. Erica Nelson
  6. Katie Porter
  1. Lisa Dikomitis
  2. Mary Chambers
  3. Moses John Chimbari
  4. Noni Mumba
  5. Peter Beresford
  6. Peter O. Ekiikina
  1. Rosemary Musesengwa
  2. Sophie Staniszewska
  3. Tina Coldham
  4. Una Rennard

Résumé

Doreen Tembo et ses collègues soutiennent que de petits changements ainsi que des changements plus larges à l’échelle du système peuvent renforcer la contribution des citoyens à la production de connaissances dans la recherche en santé. L’intégration d’un large éventail de perspectives individuelles et collectives dans la recherche en santé mondiale, en dehors de la recherche universitaire, est de plus en plus reconnue comme un mécanisme permettant d’obtenir un impact plus important. Cette activité porte de nombreux noms (encadré 1). Dans le Nord global ou dans un pays à revenu élevé, elle est couramment appelée « participation des patients et du public », « engagement » ou « participation ». Dans les pays à revenu faible et intermédiaire ou dans le Sud global, ces processus participatifs sont désignés par les termes « engagement communautaire », « participation » et « engagement et implication communautaires ». La coproduction, caractéristique centrale de l’engagement et de l’implication communautaires, est courante dans la recherche en santé tant dans le Nord que dans le Sud globaux, avec toute une gamme d’avantages potentiels. Elle aide à garantir que la recherche en santé contribue à développer les connaissances et à générer des innovations qui bénéficient aux utilisateurs de la recherche. Pour une recherche qui suscite des changements et réduit le gaspillage des ressources, la coproduction devrait commencer dès les premières étapes, lorsque les problèmes sont identifiés et les priorités définies.6 Une telle approche favorise une recherche éthique, spécifique et adaptée à la communauté locale. Il a également été montré que l’implication des utilisateurs finaux dans la conception des projets améliore le recrutement des participants et les méthodes de recherche, rendant plus probable la mise en œuvre et l’impact des résultats de la recherche. (...).

Doreen Tembo and colleagues argue that small changes as well as larger system-wide changes can strengthen citizens’ contribution to knowledge in health research Involving a broad range of individual and collective perspectives in global health research outside of academic research is gaining increasing recognition as a mechanism for achieving a greater impact. This activity goes by many names (box 1). In the global north or a high income country, it is commonly called “patient and public involvement,” “engagement,” or “participation.” In low and middle income countries or the global south, these participatory processes are termed “community engagement,” “participation,” and “community engagement and involvement.” Co-production, a core feature of community engagement and involvement, is common to health research in both the global north and south, with a range of potential benefits. It helps to ensure that health research contributes to building knowledge and generating innovations that benefit users of research. For research that drives change and reduces the waste of resources, co-production should start from the earliest stages, when problems are identified and priorities defined.6 Such an approach supports research that is ethical, specific, and appropriate to the local community. Involvement of end users in the design of projects has also been shown to improve recruitment of participants and research methods, making implementation and the impact of the research results more likely. (...).

Bibliographie citée par cette référence

Les références citées sont importées depuis des sources externes de métadonnées lorsqu’elles sont disponibles. La liste peut être partielle.

1 entrée de bibliographie citée n’a pas pu être entièrement enrichie à partir des métadonnées DOI.
Crossref: introuvable (1)
  1. Katrina M. Powell , Pamela Takayoshi (2003). Accepting Roles Created for Us: The Ethics of Reciprocity . College Composition & Communication, 54(3), 394-422. National Council of Teachers of English.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.2307/3594171 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W179275492
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  2. Emily E. Vasquez , Amaya Perez-Brumer , Richard G. Parker (2019). Social inequities and contemporary struggles for collective health in Latin America . Global Public Health, 14(6-7), 777-790. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1601752 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2945370244
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  3. Jackie Street , Tania Stafinski , Edilene Lopes , Devidas Menon (2020). Defining the role of the public in Health Technology Assessment (HTA) and HTA-informed decision-making processes . International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 36(2), 87-95. Cambridge University Press (CUP).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1017/s0266462320000094 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3011367542
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  4. Edgar S. Cahn (2004). No more throw-away people: the co-production imperative .
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W602137246
    OpenAlex
  5. (s. d.). Nelson E. A resource guide for community engagement and involvement in global health research. Institute of Development Studies and National Institute for Health Research, 2019.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  6. Jennifer Huang , Paula Darby Lipman , C. Daniel Mullins (2017). Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research . Translational Behavioral Medicine, 7(4), 773-782. Oxford University Press (OUP).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s13142-017-0487-z OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2604879108
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  7. Bec Hanley , Jane Bradburn , Marion Barnes , Clare Evans , Heather Goodare , Marcia Kelson et al. (2004). Involving the public in NHS public health, and social care research: briefing notes for researchers .
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1488517369
    OpenAlex
  8. Paulina O Tindana , Jerome A Singh , C. Shawn Tracy , Ross E. G Upshur , Abdallah S Daar , Peter A Singer et al. (2007). Grand Challenges in Global Health: Community Engagement in Research in Developing Countries . PLoS Medicine, 4(9), e273. Public Library of Science (PLoS).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040273 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2094642875
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  9. Paul Glasziou , Iain Chalmers (2018). Research waste is still a scandal—an essay by Paul Glasziou and Iain Chalmers . BMJ, k4645. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4645 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2901453117
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  10. Justin Jagosh , Paula L. Bush , Jon Salsberg , Ann C. Macaulay , Trisha Greenhalgh , Geoff Wong et al. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based participatory research: partnership synergy, trust building and related ripple effects . BMC Public Health, 15(1), 725-725. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1949-1 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1635118023
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  11. (s. d.). Shaping Our Lives. A national network of service users and disabled people. 2020. https://www.shapingourlives.org.uk/resources/our-resources/all-publications/co-production-what-is-it-guidelines-and-tips .
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  12. Seye Abimbola (2019). The foreign gaze: authorship in academic global health . BMJ Global Health, 4(5), e002068. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-002068 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2980471514
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  13. Farhana Sultana (2015). Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research . Open Collections, 6(3), 374-385. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.14288/acme.v6i3.786 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W1939041714 Crossref: introuvable
    OpenAlex
  14. Catherine Campbell , Andy Gibbs , Yugi Nair , Sbongile Maimane (2009). Frustrated Potential, False Promise or Complicated Possibilities? Empowerment and Participation Amongst Female Health Volunteers in South Africa . Journal of Health Management, 11(2), 315-336. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/097206340901100204 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2087787315
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  15. Sherry R. Arnstein (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation . Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/01944366908977225 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2008251417
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  16. Doreen Tembo , Elizabeth Morrow , Louise Worswick , Debby Lennard (2019). Is Co-production Just a Pipe Dream for Applied Health Research Commissioning? An Exploratory Literature Review . Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 50-50. Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00050 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2954660224
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  17. Sarah Maiter , Laura Simich , Nora Jacobson , Julie Wise (2008). Reciprocity . Action Research, 6(3), 305-325. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/1476750307083720 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2023640666
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  18. Juan Pablo Domecq , Gabriela Prutsky , Tarig Elraiyah , Zhen Wang , Mohammed Nabhan , Nathan Shippee et al. (2014). Patient engagement in research: a systematic review . BMC Health Services Research, 14(1), 89-89. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2100905299
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  19. Moses John Chimbari (2017). Lessons from implementation of ecohealth projects in Southern Africa: A principal investigator’s perspective . Acta Tropica, 175, 9-19. Elsevier BV.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.09.028 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2525430550
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  20. A O’Mara-Eves , G Brunton , D McDaid , S Oliver , J Kavanagh , F Jamal et al. (2013). Community engagement to reduce inequalities in health: a systematic review, meta-analysis and economic analysis . Public Health Research, 1(4), 1-526. National Institute for Health and Care Research.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3310/phr01040 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2032381728
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  21. Jo Brett , Sophie Staniszewska , Carole Mockford , Sandra Herron‐Marx , John Hughes , Colin Tysall et al. (2014). Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review . Health Expectations, 17(5), 637-650. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2049504028
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  22. Green, Gill , Boaz, Annette Louise , Stuttaford, Maria Clasina (2020). Public Participation in Health Care: Exploring the Co-Production of Knowledge . Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Livre DOI: 10.3389/978-2-88963-298-5 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3013396950
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  23. Lloyd Michener , Jennifer Cook , Syed M. Ahmed , Michael A. Yonas , Tamera Coyne-Beasley , Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola (2012). Aligning the Goals of Community-Engaged Research . Academic Medicine, 87(3), 285-291. Oxford University Press (OUP).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1097/acm.0b013e3182441680 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2034139625
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  24. Kristina Staley (2015). ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research . Research Involvement and Engagement, 1(1), 6-6. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2119404195
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  25. Kristina Staley , Duncan Barron (2019). Learning as an outcome of involvement in research: what are the implications for practice, reporting and evaluation? Research Involvement and Engagement, 5(1), 14-14. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/s40900-019-0147-1 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2943556053
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  26. Vicki Marsh , Dorcas Kamuya , Yvonne Rowa , Caroline Gikonyo , Sassy Molyneux (2008). Beginning community engagement at a busy biomedical research programme: Experiences from the KEMRI CGMRC-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya . Social Science & Medicine, 67(5), 721-733. Elsevier BV.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.02.007 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2047321261
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  27. (s. d.). Carr S. Position paper: Are mainstream mental health services ready to progress transformative co‐production? National Development Team for Inclusion, 2016.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  28. Sapfo Lignou , Liliana Capitao , Julia Madeleine Hamer-Hunt , Ilina Singh (2019). Co-Production: An Ethical Model for Mental Health Research? The American Journal of Bioethics, 19(8), 49-51. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1619877 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2964263246
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  29. Flora Cornish , Catherine Campbell , Anuprita Shukla , Riddhi Banerji (2012). From brothel to boardroom: Prospects for community leadership of HIV interventions in the context of global funding practices . Health & Place, 18(3), 468-474. Elsevier BV.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.018 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2065860479
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  30. Bipin Adhikari , Christopher Pell , Phaik Yeong Cheah (2020). Community engagement and ethical global health research . Global Bioethics, 31(1), 1-12. Informa UK Limited.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2019.1703504 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2995258772
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  31. Jean Slutsky , Emma Tumilty , Catherine Max , Lanting Lu , Sripen Tantivess , Renata Curi Hauegen et al. (2016). Patterns of public participation . Journal of Health Organization and Management, 30(5), 751-768. Emerald.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1108/jhom-03-2016-0037 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2490366199
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  32. Joanna C Crocker , Ignacio Ricci-Cabello , Adwoa Parker , Jennifer A Hirst , Alan Chant , Sophie Petit-Zeman et al. (2018). Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis . BMJ, 363, k4738. BMJ.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4738 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2902219846
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  33. Gary Hickey (2018). The potential for coproduction to add value to research . Health Expectations, 21(4), 693-694. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/hex.12821 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2888850444
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  34. (s. d.). INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: involving the public in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE; 2012. https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/9938_INVOLVE_Briefing_Notes_WEB.pdf .
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  35. Mio Fredriksson , Jonathan Q. Tritter (2017). Disentangling patient and public involvement in healthcare decisions: why the difference matters . Sociology of Health & Illness, 39(1), 95-111. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12483 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2551415221
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  36. Tom Clark (2008). `We're Over-Researched Here!' . Sociology, 42(5), 953-970. SAGE Publications.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1177/0038038508094573 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2103849969
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  37. (s. d.). UNICEF. Minimum quality standards and indicators for community engagement. UNICEF, 2020.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  38. Patricia Wilson , Elspeth Mathie , Julia Keenan , Elaine McNeilly , Claire Goodman , Amanda Howe et al. (2015). ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study . Health Services and Delivery Research, 3(38), 1-176. National Institute for Health and Care Research.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03380 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2218926431
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  39. SEGUN GBADEGESIN , DAVID WENDLER (2006). PROTECTING COMMUNITIES IN HEALTH RESEARCH FROM EXPLOITATION . Bioethics, 20(5), 248-253. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00501.x OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2105638117
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  40. J. Jaiswal , C. LoSchiavo , D. C. Perlman (2020). Disinformation, Misinformation and Inequality-Driven Mistrust in the Time of COVID-19: Lessons Unlearned from AIDS Denialism . AIDS and Behavior, 24(10), 2776-2780. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-02925-y OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W3026052370
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  41. (s. d.). Hickey G Brearley S Coldham T. Guidance on co-producing a research project. INVOLVE, 2018.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  42. Ruth Gaare Bernheim (2016). Public Engagement in Emergency Preparedness and Response . Dans Emergency Ethics (pp. 155-185). Oxford University Press.
    Type: Chapitre de livre DOI: 10.1093/med/9780190270742.003.0005 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2482096163
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  43. L. Gibbs , K. Block , C. MacDougall , L. Harms , E. Baker , J. Richardson et al. (2018). Ethical Use and Impact of Participatory Approaches to Research in Post-Disaster Environments: An Australian Bushfire Case Study . BioMed Research International, 2018, 1-11. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1155/2018/5621609 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2807775078
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  44. Sultana (2007). Reflexivity, positionality and participatory ethics: negotiating fieldwork dilemmas in international research . ACME, 6, 374.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  45. Rosemary Musesengwa , Moses John Chimbari (2017). Experiences of community members and researchers on community engagement in an Ecohealth project in South Africa and Zimbabwe . BMC Medical Ethics, 18(1), 76-76. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0236-3 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2775316028
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  46. Sarah Carr (2016). Position paper: are mainstream mental health services ready to progress transformative co-production?
    Type: Livre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2528835190
    OpenAlex
  47. (s. d.). Cahn E. No more throw-away people: the co-production imperative. Essential Books Ltd, 2000.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  48. Bridget Pratt , Adnan A. Hyder (2018). Designing research funding schemes to promote global health equity: An exploration of current practice in health systems research . Developing World Bioethics, 18(2), 76-90. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/dewb.12136 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2552094480
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  49. Emma Terämä , Melanie Smallman , Simon J. Lock , Charlotte Johnson , Martin Zaltz Austwick (2016). Beyond Academia – Interrogating Research Impact in the Research Excellence Framework . PLOS ONE, 11(12), e0168533. Public Library of Science (PLoS).
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168533 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2565150899
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  50. Anna Ramsbottom , Eleanor O’Brien , Lucrezio Ciotti , Judit Takacs (2018). Enablers and Barriers to Community Engagement in Public Health Emergency Preparedness: A Literature Review . Journal of Community Health, 43(2), 412-420. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1007/s10900-017-0415-7 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2746317728
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  51. Mark Shucksmith (2016). InterAction: How can academics and the third sector work together to influence policy and practice? Issue Lab (Candid).
    Type: Rapport OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2939595585
    OpenAlex
  52. Trisha Greenhalgh , Lisa Hinton , Teresa Finlay , Alastair Macfarlane , Nick Fahy , Ben Clyde et al. (2019). Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co‐design pilot . Health Expectations, 22(4), 785-801. Wiley.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.1111/hex.12888 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2941496369
    Crossref OpenAlex OpenCitations
  53. (s. d.). Shucksmith MO. InterAction: How can academics and the third sector work together to influence policy and practice? Carnegie UK Trust, 2016.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  54. (s. d.). Owen D, Featherstone H, Leslie K. The state of play: public engagement with research in UK universities. 2016. htts://www.publicengagement.ac.uk/sites/default/files/publication/state_of_play_final.pdf
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  55. (s. d.). AVAC. UNAIDS. Good participatory practice: guidelines for biomedical HIV prevention trials. 2nd ed. UNAIDS, 2011.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  56. Erica Nelson (2019). A Resource Guide for Community Engagement and Involvement in Global Health Research . OpenDocs (Institute of Development Studies).
    Type: Autre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2980153035
    OpenAlex
  57. Gill Green , Annette Boaz , Maria Stuttaford (2019). Editorial: Public Participation in Health Care: Exploring the Co-production of Knowledge . Frontiers in Sociology, 4, 73-73. Frontiers Media SA.
    Type: Article DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2019.00073 OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2984362559
    OpenAlex
  58. (s. d.). UK Research and Innovation, Science and Technology Facilities Council. Sci-fi comic gives voice to young people during pandemic 2020. https://stfc.ukri.org/news-events-and-publications/whats-happening/sci-fi-comic-gives-voice-to-young-people-during-pandemic/ .
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  59. Katharine Wright (2019). The Nuffield Council on Bioethics: Contributing to debate on the ethical conduct of research in global health emergencies . The Knowledge Bank (The Ohio State University).
    Type: Autre OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W2999632976
    OpenAlex
  60. (s. d.). Farr M Davies R Davies P Bagnall D Brangan E Andrews H. A map of resources for co-producing research in health and social care. Version 1. 2, May 2020. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) ARC West and People in Health West of England. University of Bristol and University of West of England, 2020.
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  61. Slutsky, Jean , Tumilty, Emma , Max, Cathering , Lu, Lanting , Tantivess, Sripen , Hauegen, Renata Curi et al. (2016). Patterns of public participation: opportunity structures and mobilization from a cross-national perspective \n . Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick).
    Type: Article OpenAlex: https://openalex.org/W4210746783
    OpenAlex
  62. (s. d.). Wright K. COVID-19, Research in global health emergencies. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2020. https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/blog/were-all-in-this-together-what-does-this-mean-for-covid-19-research .
    Type: Autre
    Crossref
  63. (s. d.). Surridge H, Green D, Hickey G, et al. Public reviewing with the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 2019. https://www.invo.org.uk/resource-centre/learning-and-development/public-reviewing-with-the-national-institute-for-health-research-nihr/ .
    Type: Autre
    Crossref