Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 19/05/2025 10:38

Bluesky Registre de revue systématique crd.york.ac.uk Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Registered: social validity assessments of interventions for autistic children, systematic review of group designs www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/vie... NDBIs "are purported to be seen as more fun and acceptable to families... However, the degree to which this has been assessed empirically is unclear"?

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Registre de revue systématique Récupéré Publication crd.york.ac.uk

Rachel Schuck, Lacey Chetcuti, Kaitlynn Baiden, Mirko Uljarevic, Crystal Bahamondes (2025). Social Validity Assessment in Group-Design Intervention Studies for Autistic Children: A Systematic Review. CRD/PROSPERO. Stanford University.

Date de publication
13/05/2025
Identifiant
CRD420251006363
Auteurs
Rachel Schuck, Lacey Chetcuti, Kaitlynn Baiden, Mirko Uljarevic, Crystal Bahamondes
Source
CRD/PROSPERO
Type de référence
systematic_review_registry
Éditeur
Stanford University
Source de métadonnées
crd.york.ac.uk

Résumé

How frequently is social validity assessed in group-design behavioral intervention studies for autistic children? What do social validity assessments consist of? For example, who is being asked for their opinion on social validity, when is social validity being assessed, and how is it being assessed (e.g., via questionnaire, interview, observation, etc.) Particular emphasis will be placed on characterization of social validity assessments where the autistic intervention recipient is a participant. What are the results of the social validity assessments? How does social validity assessment in NDBIs compare to more traditional behavioral intervention models? (In terms of frequency and findings)