Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 19 May 2025 10:38

Back to posts Previous post Next post
Bluesky Systematic review registry crd.york.ac.uk Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms
Open original post
View on Bluesky

Information about the link integrated into the post

Systematic review registry

Rachel Schuck, Lacey Chetcuti, Kaitlynn Baiden, Mirko Uljarevic, Crystal Bahamondes (2025). Social Validity Assessment in Group-Design Intervention Studies for Autistic Children: A Systematic Review. CRD/PROSPERO. Stanford University.

More information

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

Systematic review registry Fetched Post crd.york.ac.uk

Rachel Schuck, Lacey Chetcuti, Kaitlynn Baiden, Mirko Uljarevic, Crystal Bahamondes (2025). Social Validity Assessment in Group-Design Intervention Studies for Autistic Children: A Systematic Review. CRD/PROSPERO. Stanford University.

Publication date
13 May 2025
Identifier
CRD420251006363
Authors
Rachel Schuck, Lacey Chetcuti, Kaitlynn Baiden, Mirko Uljarevic, Crystal Bahamondes
Source
CRD/PROSPERO
Reference type
systematic_review_registry
Publisher
Stanford University
Metadata source
crd.york.ac.uk

Abstract

How frequently is social validity assessed in group-design behavioral intervention studies for autistic children? What do social validity assessments consist of? For example, who is being asked for their opinion on social validity, when is social validity being assessed, and how is it being assessed (e.g., via questionnaire, interview, observation, etc.) Particular emphasis will be placed on characterization of social validity assessments where the autistic intervention recipient is a participant. What are the results of the social validity assessments? How does social validity assessment in NDBIs compare to more traditional behavioral intervention models? (In terms of frequency and findings)

Open source