Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 04/03/2025 11:40

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

"ABA providers... are critical allies in the fight to ensure that profoundly autistic children and adults are appropriately supported across their lifespans"? link.springer.com/article/10.1... more claims that denying autistics rights, standards, etc, helps (vs harms) us, evidence-free, free

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Amy S. F. Lutz (2025). Applied Behavior Analysis in the Crosshairs: Neurodiversity, the Intact Mind, and Autism Politics. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 48(3), 547-553. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Date de publication
03/03/2025
Identifiant
10.1007/s40614-025-00439-3
Auteurs
Amy S. F. Lutz
Source
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Détails
48(3), 547-553
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Recent attacks on applied behavior analysis (ABA) by neurodiversity advocates share a common theme with opposition to other supports, such as subminimum wage vocational programs and congregate residential settings: the intact mind assumption, which maintains that even profoundly autistic people have typical intelligence, even if they present as severely cognitively impaired. This article examines the history of the intact mind assumption, which was largely shaped by psychoanalytic theory in the mid-20 th century, as well as its impact on contemporary disability policy and practice.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée