Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 4 Mar 2025 11:40

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

"ABA providers... are critical allies in the fight to ensure that profoundly autistic children and adults are appropriately supported across their lifespans"? link.springer.com/article/10.1... more claims that denying autistics rights, standards, etc, helps (vs harms) us, evidence-free, free

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Amy S. F. Lutz (2025). Applied Behavior Analysis in the Crosshairs: Neurodiversity, the Intact Mind, and Autism Politics. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 48(3), 547-553. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
3 Mar 2025
Identifier
10.1007/s40614-025-00439-3
Authors
Amy S. F. Lutz
Source
Perspectives on Behavior Science
Details
48(3), 547-553
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Recent attacks on applied behavior analysis (ABA) by neurodiversity advocates share a common theme with opposition to other supports, such as subminimum wage vocational programs and congregate residential settings: the intact mind assumption, which maintains that even profoundly autistic people have typical intelligence, even if they present as severely cognitively impaired. This article examines the history of the intact mind assumption, which was largely shaped by psychoanalytic theory in the mid-20 th century, as well as its impact on contemporary disability policy and practice.

Study authors in this cited reference