Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 10/09/2024 13:14

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Nur Givon-Benjio, Tom Marx, Marissa Hartston, Idan M. Aderka, Bat-Sheva Hadad, Hadas Okon-Singer (2024). The relationship between interpersonal distance preference and estimation accuracy in autism. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0306536. Public Library of Science (PLoS).

Date de publication
09/09/2024
Identifiant
10.1371/journal.pone.0306536
Auteurs
Nur Givon-Benjio, Tom Marx, Marissa Hartston, Idan M. Aderka, Bat-Sheva Hadad, Hadas Okon-Singer
Source
PLOS ONE
Détails
19(9), e0306536
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

People naturally seek an interpersonal distance that feels comfortable, striking a balance between not being too close or too far from others until reaching a state of equilibrium. Previous studies on interpersonal distance preferences among autistic individuals have yielded inconsistent results. Some show a preference for greater distance, while others indicate a preference for shorter distances, or reveal higher variance in preferences among autistic individuals. In a related vein, previous studies have also investigated the way autistics accurately judge distance, and these studies have received inconsistent results, with some showing superior spatial abilities and others indicating biases in distance estimations. However, the link between distance estimation and preference has never been examined. To address this gap, our study measured interpersonal distance preferences and estimations and tested the correlation between the two factors. The results indicate greater variance among autistic people in both the preference of distance and the ability to estimate distance accurately, suggesting that inconsistencies in previous studies originate from greater individual differences among autistics. Furthermore, only among autistic individuals were interpersonal distance preference and estimation bias associated in a manner that violated equilibrium. Underestimation bias (judging others as closer than they are) was linked to a preference for closer proximity, while overestimation bias (judging others as further away) was associated with a preference for maintaining a greater distance. This connection suggests that biases in the estimation of interpersonal distance contribute to extreme preferences (being too close or too far away). Taken together, the findings suggest that biases in the estimation of interpersonal distance are associated with socially inappropriate distance preferences among autistics.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée