Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 10 Sep 2024 13:14

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Nur Givon-Benjio, Tom Marx, Marissa Hartston, Idan M. Aderka, Bat-Sheva Hadad, Hadas Okon-Singer (2024). The relationship between interpersonal distance preference and estimation accuracy in autism. PLOS ONE, 19(9), e0306536. Public Library of Science (PLoS).

Publication date
9 Sep 2024
Identifier
10.1371/journal.pone.0306536
Authors
Nur Givon-Benjio, Tom Marx, Marissa Hartston, Idan M. Aderka, Bat-Sheva Hadad, Hadas Okon-Singer
Source
PLOS ONE
Details
19(9), e0306536
Reference type
article
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

People naturally seek an interpersonal distance that feels comfortable, striking a balance between not being too close or too far from others until reaching a state of equilibrium. Previous studies on interpersonal distance preferences among autistic individuals have yielded inconsistent results. Some show a preference for greater distance, while others indicate a preference for shorter distances, or reveal higher variance in preferences among autistic individuals. In a related vein, previous studies have also investigated the way autistics accurately judge distance, and these studies have received inconsistent results, with some showing superior spatial abilities and others indicating biases in distance estimations. However, the link between distance estimation and preference has never been examined. To address this gap, our study measured interpersonal distance preferences and estimations and tested the correlation between the two factors. The results indicate greater variance among autistic people in both the preference of distance and the ability to estimate distance accurately, suggesting that inconsistencies in previous studies originate from greater individual differences among autistics. Furthermore, only among autistic individuals were interpersonal distance preference and estimation bias associated in a manner that violated equilibrium. Underestimation bias (judging others as closer than they are) was linked to a preference for closer proximity, while overestimation bias (judging others as further away) was associated with a preference for maintaining a greater distance. This connection suggests that biases in the estimation of interpersonal distance contribute to extreme preferences (being too close or too far away). Taken together, the findings suggest that biases in the estimation of interpersonal distance are associated with socially inappropriate distance preferences among autistics.

Study authors in this cited reference