Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 29/06/2024 12:53

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Robert M. Jertberg, Frederik J. Wienicke, Krystian Andruszkiewicz, Sander Begeer, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Hilde M. Geurts, Ralph de Vries, Erik Van der Burg (2024). Differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals in audiovisual speech integration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 164, 105787. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
septembre 2024
Identifiant
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105787
Auteurs
Robert M. Jertberg, Frederik J. Wienicke, Krystian Andruszkiewicz, Sander Begeer, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Hilde M. Geurts, Ralph de Vries, Erik Van der Burg
Source
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Détails
164, 105787
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Research has indicated unique challenges in audiovisual integration of speech among autistic individuals, although methodological differences have led to divergent findings. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies that measured audiovisual speech integration among both autistic and non-autistic individuals. Across the 18 identified studies (combined N = 952), autistic individuals showed impaired audiovisual integration compared to their non-autistic peers (g = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.53, 0.85], p <.001). This difference was not found to be influenced by participants' mean ages, studies' sample sizes, risk-of-bias scores, or paradigms employed. However, a subgroup analysis suggested that child studies may show larger between-group differences than adult ones. The prevailing pattern of impaired audiovisual speech integration in autism may have cascading effects on communicative and social behavior. However, small samples and inconsistency in designs/analyses translated into considerable heterogeneity in findings and opacity regarding the influence of underlying unisensory and attentional factors. We recommend three key directions for future research: larger samples, more research with adults, and standardization of methodology and analytical approaches.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée